Mad Hedge Technology Letter
March 27, 2023
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(SMART MONEY HAS LEFT)
(AAPL), (MSFT), (FRC)
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
March 27, 2023
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(SMART MONEY HAS LEFT)
(AAPL), (MSFT), (FRC)
The Federal Reserve is moving deeper into a trapped corner because the Fed is facing inflation that they haven’t fixed yet.
That’s not a problem so far as they are gradually lifting rates to cure it, but what happens when a systemic event occurs and they are forced to pivot when inflation is still at 6%?
This is why I have always championed just doing one big rate raise to get it over with.
The longer the Fed draws it out, the more chance they have to pivot when inflation is still toxic to the consumer.
Why do I care about all this?
The systemic event has arrived and that could mean that precious dollars are steered away from tech shares in April and are funneled over to the banking sector where the smart money is buying the dip in “too big to fail” banking stocks.
Since the beginning of March, three U.S. banks have failed and others — most notably California-based First Republic (FRC) — are teetering on the edge amid deposit outflows.
All else equal, in a banking crisis, investors would expect the Fed to cut rates to ease pressure on the financial system.
Since 1977, the Federal Reserve has worked to fulfill a "dual mandate" of achieving maximum employment and stable prices.
Tech stocks had a strong initial bounce from the banking shock, but that doesn’t mean it will last.
I took profits in some of my tech positions and the pricing action in the last few days has been poor to the upside.
I do believe we could experience a transitory sideways move which might be followed by an earnings scare that could induce a short-term pullback.
Tech has done remarkably well in the first few months of the year and the grind up during the banking crisis has shown resilience.
However, where is the use case for the incremental investor in tech?
Sure, we got some nice bounces from Facebook and Google cutting staff.
Getting leaner is certainly better.
Then there was the OpenAI bounce with artificial intelligence going from a fad to the new buzzword.
Microsoft and Apple have separated themselves from the crowd.
I am concerned about the breadth of the tech sector because many growth companies are starting to dip and dip some more.
It’s true that many investors are on the sidelines because they believe that the banking crisis has just started.
At the end of the day wasn’t it Russia that was supposed to preside over a failing economy susceptible to bank runs?
Ironically enough, by the end of 2021, as a result of high oil prices and a post-pandemic recovery, Russia's annual growth rate exceeded 5%. While the rate was expected to slow down in 2022, prewar forecasters would pin it at around 3 percent.
After the buy-the-dip in banks crowd moved out of the safety tech trade, we could be in for a sideways correction that could lead to some downside risk.
It doesn’t help that the Western financial system has creaky knees and it seems at this point tech might have to navigate around bank blowups in the short term.
The real safety tech trade continues to be Apple and Microsoft because the banking contagion has effectively led to the death of tech startups and small caps.
Call this the Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde market.
On the up days, we see the kindly ministrations of Dr. Jekyll.
On the down days, we suffer from the evil hand of Mr. Hyde.
To say that traders are confused would be an understatement. Many seasoned pros have told me that this is one of the most difficult markets they have ever seen.
Fridays have been particularly treacherous when weekly options expire. Some 56% of all options trading now takes place with expirations of five days or less. Trading before 4:00 PM sees billions of dollars of hot money trying to force closing prices just in or out of the money for key at-the-money strike prices.
What is especially disturbing is that some 80% of the gain in the S&P 500 (SPY) this year has been in just seven names, Meta, (META), Alphabet (GOOGL), Microsoft (MSFT), Apple (AAPL), Amazon (AMZN), Netflix (NFLX) and Tesla (TSLA). Most other stocks went nowhere….or down. That much concentration means that any rallies lack confidence and will fail….for now.
Remember these names because when we finally do get a real upside breakout, they will be the leaders. You can take that to the bank.
Thanks to turmoil in the House of Representatives intent on a national default, bonds have given up 70 of the 120-basis point drop in yields since October. That deprives us of one of our biggest money makers of 2022, our long bond trades.
That means were are also seeing the automatic flip side of the bond trade, a strong US Dollar (UUP), and weak precious metals, (GLD) and (SLV), and emerging markets (EEM).
This too shall end.
If it was excess liquidity that caused stocks to rocket for 13 years, then maybe we should be focusing on what little liquidity is left. That would be the font of government money pouring into infrastructure and alternative energy plays.
Some $370 billion I know available for investment in ESG, would most of it going into the battery industry for the burgeoning electric vehicle industry. Even foreign firms like Finland’s Neste is moving to the US to cash in on federal munificence, converting an old US oil refinery to produce diesel fuel out of animal and vegetable fat (click here for the link).
Probably the best bet here is in California-based Enphase Energy (ENPH), which makes a 40% gross profit margins on microinverters for solar panels and has just seen a 42% dive in its share price. That makes (ENPH) a BUY. Hint: solar stocks always follow the price of oil to which it is tied, which has lately been down.
Some nimble and aggressive trading managed to push me back in the green for February, taking me up +0.93% on the month. That’s a dramatic improvement of +5.48% from a week ago.
You might even call it making a silk purse from a sow’s ear.
My 2023 year-to-date performance is still at the top at +23.28%. The S&P 500 (SPY) is up +4.32% so far in 2023. My trailing one-year return maintains a sky-high +86.58% versus -12.97% for the S&P 500.
That brings my 15-year total return to +620.47%, some 2.78 times the S&P 500 (SPX) over the same period. My average annualized return has recovered to +46.83%, still the highest in the industry.
Last week, I piled on a Tesla (TSLA) March $155-$260 short strangle betting that the stock can stay within a $95 range for 19 trading days. I also added a deep in-the-money long in the bond market for the first time in six weeks. Both positions turned immediately profitable.
My Ten-Year View
When we come out the other side of the recession, we will be perfectly poised to launch into my new American Golden Age, or the next Roaring Twenties. The economy decarbonizing and technology hyper accelerating, creating enormous investment opportunities. The Dow Average will rise by 800% to 240,000 or more in the coming decade. The new America will be far more efficient and profitable than the old.
Dow 240,000 here we come!
Q4 GDP Dips, from 3.9% to 2.7% in the October-December quarter. Consumption took a dive, which is amazing over the holidays. This is nowhere near a recession.
Fed Minutes Show More Hikes to Come, with the emphasis on the plural. That could take the overnight borrowing rate to a 5.40% high. It certainly pees on the parade for the falling interest rates crowd.
The Tail is Wagging the Dog, with short, dated options, often same-day expiration dominating trading every Friday. Billions of dollars are battling around key strike prices attempting to force expirations in or out of the money. No place for the little guy. Better to take Fridays off.
Netflix Slashes Prices in 30 countries, taking the stock down a modest 3%. (NFLX) is still the leader in the sector with 231 million subscribers, followed by Amazon (200 million), Disney Plus (162 million, HBO Max (95 million, Peacock (18 million), and Hulu 47 million). Buy (NFLX) and (AMZN) on dips.
Individual 401k’s Lost 23% in 2022, according to a study from Fidelity. High inflation is shrinking the remaining purchasing power even faster. A rising number of workers are also borrowing against their 401k’s to make ends meet. Such loans can go up to 50% of the principal. Better start making up the losses or you’ll be spending your golden years working at Taco Bell.
Apple to Add Glucose Monitor on its Watches, to aid diabetic clients. Some 38 million Americans have diabetes and given the obesity epidemic that figure is certain to rise. It highlights Big Tech’s move into the low-hanging fruit in health care.
Existing Home Sales Dive 0.7% in January, to a 4 million annualized rate, the weakest since October 2010. That makes 12 consecutive months of falling sales. The Median Home Price sold rose to $359,000. An imminent national debt crisis and spiking interest rates is not a great environment in which to sell your home.
Biden Ukraine Visit Tanks Gas and Oil Prices, cutting Russia’s chances of a win and eventually leading to a flood of oil on the market. Biden’s visit is sending the message to Putin that there’s no chance of a win here. Energy is hitting two-year lows across the board. Only energy stocks are staying high. Energy is getting so cheap it might be worth a trade.
Germany Accelerates Move Towards Alternatives, permanently cutting all ties with Russia energy. Europe’s biggest economy, and the fourth largest in the world, hopes to get 80% of its electricity from solar and wind by 2030. Hydrogen is also entering the picture. Other countries will follow.
On Monday, February 27 at 8:30 AM EST, US Durable Goods are out.
On Tuesday, February 28 at 9:00 AM, the S&P Case Shiller National Home Price Index for December is released.
On Wednesday, March 1 at 10:00 AM, the ISM Manufacturing PMI is printed.
On Thursday, March 2 at 8:30 AM, the Weekly Jobless Claims are announced.
On Friday, March 3 at 8:30 AM, the ISM Non-Manufacturing PMI. At 2:00 the Baker Hughes Oil Rig Count is out.
As for me, I usually get a request to fund some charity about once a day. I ignore them because they usually enrich the fundraisers more than the potential beneficiaries. But one request seemed to hit all my soft spots at once.
Would I be interested in financing the refit of the USS Potomac (AG-25), Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s presidential yacht?
I had just sold my oil and gas business for an outrageous profit and had some free time on my hands so I said, “Hell Yes,” but only if I get to drive. The trick was to raise the necessary $5 million without it costing me any money.
To say that the Potomac had fallen on hard times was an understatement.
When Roosevelt entered the White House in 1932, he inherited the presidential yacht of Herbert Hoover, the USS Sequoia. But the Sequoia was entirely made of wood, which Roosevelt had a lifelong fear of. When he was a young child, he nearly perished when a wooden ship caught fire and sank, he was passed to a lifeboat by a devoted nanny.
Roosevelt settled on the 165-foot USS Electra, launched from the Manitowoc Shipyard in Wisconsin, whose lines he greatly admired. The government had ordered 34 of these cutters to fight rum runners across the Great Lakes during Prohibition. Deliveries began just as the ban on alcohol ended.
Some $60,000 was poured into the ship to bring it up to presidential standards and it was made wheelchair accessible with an elevator, which FDR operated himself with ropes. The ship became the “floating White House,” and numerous political deals were hammered out on its decks. Some noted guests included King George VI of England, Queen Elisabeth, and Winston Churchill.
During WWII Roosevelt hosted his weekly “fireside chats” on the ship’s short-wave radio. The concern was that the Germans would attempt to block transmissions if broadcast came from the White House.
After Roosevelt’s death, the Potamac was decommissioned and sold off by Harry Truman, who favored the much more substantial 243-foot USS Williamsburg. The Potamac became a Dept of Fisheries enforcement boat until 1960 and then was used as a ferry to Puerto Rico until 1962.
An attempt was made to sail it through the Panama Canal to the 1962 World’s Fair in Seattle, but it broke down on the way in Long Beach, CA. In 1964 Elvis Presley bought the Potomac so it could be auctioned off to raise money for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. It sold for $65,000. It then disappeared from maritime registration in 1970. At one point there was an attempt to turn it into a floating disco.
In 1980 a US Coast Guard cutter spotted a suspicious radar return 20 miles off the coast of San Francisco. It turned out to be the Potomac loaded to the gunnels with bales of illicit marijuana from Mexico. The Coast Guard seized the ship and towed it to the Treasure Island naval base under the Bay Bridge. By now the 50-year-old ship was leaking badly. The marijuana bales soaked up the seawater and the ship became so heavy it sank at its moorings.
Then a long rescue effort began. Not wanting to get blamed for the sinking of a presidential yacht on its watch the Navy raised the Potomac at its own expense, about $10 million, putting its heavy lift crane to use. It was then sold to the City of Oakland, Ca for a paltry $15,000.
The troubled ship was placed on a barge and floated upriver to Stockton, CA, which had a large but underutilized unionized maritime repair business. The government subsidies started raining down from the skies and a down-to-the-rivets restoration began. Two rebuilt WWII tugboat engines replaced the old, exhausted ones. A nationwide search was launched to recover artifacts from FDR’s time on the ship. The Potomac returned to the seas in 1993.
I came on the scene in 2007 when the ship was due for a second refit. The foundation that now owned the ship needed $5 million. So, I did a deal with National Public Radio for free advertising in exchange for a few hundred dinner cruise tickets. NPR then held a contest to auction off tickets and kept the cash (what was the name of FDR’s dog? Fala!).
I also negotiated landing rights at the Pier One San Francisco Ferry Terminal, which involved negotiating with a half dozen unions, unheard of in San Francisco maritime circles. Every cruise sold out over two years, selling 2,500 tickets. To keep everyone well-lubricated I became the largest Bay Area buyer of wine for those years. I still have a free T-shirt from every winery in Napa Valley.
It turned out to be the most successful fundraiser in the history of NPR and the Potomac. We easily got the $5 million and then some. The ship received a new coat of white paint, new rigging, modern navigation gear, and more period artifacts. I obtained my captain’s license and learned how to command a former coast guard cutter.
It was a win-win-win.
I was trained by a retired US Navy nuclear submarine commander, who was a real expert at navigating a now thin-hulled 73-year-old ship in San Francisco’s crowded bay waters. We were only licensed to cruise up to the Golden Gate bridge and not beyond, as the ship was so old.
The inaugural cruise was the social event of the year in San Francisco with everyone wearing period Depression-era dress. It was attended by FDR’s grandson, James Roosevelt III, a Bay area attorney who was a dead ringer for his grandfather. I mercilessly grilled him for unpublished historical anecdotes. A handful of still-living Roosevelt cabinet members also came, as well as many WWII veterans.
As we approached the Golden Gate Bridge, some poor soul jumped off and the Coast Guard asked us to perform search and rescue until they could get a ship on station. No body was ever found. It certainly made for an eventful first cruise.
Of the original 34 cutters constructed only four remain. The other three make up the Circle Line tour boats that sail around Manhattan several times a day.
Last summer I boarded the Potomac for the first time in 14 years for a pleasant afternoon cruise with some guests from Australia. Some of the older crew recognized me and saluted. In the cabin, I noticed a brass urn oddly out of place. It contained the ashes of the sub-commander who had trained me all those years ago.
Good Luck and Good Trading,
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Captain Thomas at the Helm
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 24, 2023
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(PART 2: THE BEST OF THE REST IN QUANTUM COMPUTING)
(GOOGL), (QUBT), (IBM), (MSFT), (AMAT)
Alphabet (GOOGL)
In 2019, Google claimed that it had achieved what it called quantum supremacy. The company claimed to have built a computer with capabilities far beyond those of traditional computers.
In a report published in Nature, Google said its quantum computer managed to calculate something that would take a normal machine 10,000 years.
What practical applications Google's performance will have in the real world is still unclear. The initial computation was a demonstration of capability rather than a product that will have a significant commercial impact any time soon.
Having a horse in the race will also mean they can turn it up a notch once they receive more direction on where this might lead.
Like so many of its other companies, Alphabet invests heavily in the latest computer technology.
Many of these ventures probably won't bring in much money; others, on the other hand, will likely recoup the company's entire research budget and then some. And the good thing about Alphabet is that it's so busy that a single project, such as B. quantum computing, will not decide on the entire investment.
I am not going to sit here and say that Google is a quantum computing company because it’s not, but they are ready to pounce if the opportunity presents itself.
Quantum Computing (QUBT)
Quantum Computing is an innovative company focused on its namesake. It sees a market opportunity in the ability to create a service that coordinates computing needs.
There are providers of quantum computers, such as IonQ or Rigetti. Then there are customers in large companies, universities, or research laboratories. Quantum Computing sits in the middle, making software to help customers manage their quantum computing needs.
Currently, quantum computing has almost no revenue. Management acknowledges that the company is still in the early stages of market development and understanding customer use cases.
QUBT stock is highly speculative, as are most other companies in the sector. However, as the market for quantum computing vendors and customers grows, a brokerage service that connects the two could represent a fairly profitable niche.
IBM (IBM)
Tech analysts like to compare IBM to companies like Radio Shack and Eastman Kodak (KODK) as a dinosaur inevitably heading towards the dustbin of history.
However, the truth is much more nuanced.
IBM still achieves $60 billion a year in total revenue, and that number is actually on the rise again. They also have a PE ratio of 21 as its ongoing operations in consulting, services, and cloud, among others, are very profitable. And IBM continues to invest heavily in research and development, including quantum computing.
IBM's quantum computing division promises to unlock information beyond the reach of even the world's fastest supercomputers. The IBM partnership for quantum computing already involves 160 Fortune 500 companies as well as national laboratories and academic institutions. These partners work in areas such as finance, chemistry, and logistics.
Microsoft (MSFT)
Like IBM, Microsoft wants to take the lead in the emerging field of quantum computing. Microsoft has an inbuilt advantage, as its Azure cloud platform already has a massive installed base with a variety of Fortune 500 customers.
Now Microsoft is building its quantum computing capabilities directly into Azure. Microsoft describes this as “the world’s first full-featured, open cloud ecosystem for quantum computing.”
It makes a lot of sense that this would be offered as part of a cloud package. After all, most customers probably don't need their own supercomputer. Rather, they want the ability to buy that computing power only when they need it.
If Microsoft can seamlessly integrate this experience into its native Azure platform, it could be a major win, both for this product and for securing greater market share in cloud computing.
Applied Materials (AMAT)
Another approach to betting on quantum computing stocks is to be long on suppliers. Given that the technology is still very new, it can be difficult to determine which companies will ultimately be among the winners in this space. What is certain, however, is that if quantum computing catches on, we will need faster and more powerful semiconductors.
Applied Materials is one of the industry leaders in terms of patents and industry know-how when it comes to manufacturing chips that will be used in quantum computing hardware. During a gold rush, you want to be the one selling the shovels. Applied Materials should be the shovel dealer for the quantum computing industry.
In the meantime, Applied Materials' existing business is extremely profitable.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 8, 2023
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(CHATBOT SINKS STOCK 8%)
(GOOGL), (MSFT)
Down 8% on a faulty chatbot conversation – that’s what happened to Google’s (GOOGL) stock today.
That’s why we need to pare back the euphoria and nonstop celebration of ChatGPT.
Hold your horses.
It’s an emerging technology and could end up with chatbots chatting with other chatbots for little or no value.
My point is that it can still go very wrong from here.
Google’s stock swan dived on Wednesday after its own iteration of A.I. chatbot erroneously answered a question about the first usage of space telescopes via its promotional material.
It all lends itself to surmise that Google is way behind in this game and Microsoft has the situation by the scruff of the neck.
Only just a few days ago, Microsoft integrated the AI technology into the front page of its Bing search engine, and is available for user downloads on the Bing app.
The drop in share price meant that Google lost more than $100 billion off its market cap.
The service called Bard is to compete with the popular ChatGPT.
Despite the chatbot’s claim in the ad, NASA reports that the first photo of a planet outside the Milky Way was taken by the Very Large Telescope in 2004 — nearly 19 years before NASA’s Webb telescope.
Unpreparedness by Google could translate into a significant loss of ad revenue for Google’s cash cow Google search.
The desperation of throwing Bard out there not on their timeline could mean they are exposing a product that isn’t up to Google’s standards.
An AI chatbot that consistently delivers false answers will turn off an advertiser quicker than no AI chatbot.
Investing in Google is still worth it even if it takes time to correct the quality of their AI. because it is logical to give a good company the benefit of the doubt.
Another problem is that Google could be stuck with bad AI for a few years before it turns the corner.
For better or worse, they were forced to go public with whatever they had just for the optics of competition even if they are badly lagging behind.
The worst-case scenario is receiving a direct blow to the cranium in terms of total ad revenue.
Google is still relying on search to drive the rest of its business.
They earned over $200 billion in ad revenue in 2021.
This is the first threat to Google’s search model in a generation and the threat has them on their toes.
I do believe they possess the resources to solve this issue.
No doubt that Google CEO Sundar Pichai is throwing the kitchen sink to find and poach the best AI engineers to beef up the chatbot team.
Ultimately, the real new world of higher interest rates and high inflation environment means that your father’s tech playbook must be thrown out the window.
It’s quite evident that we are in the midst of a paradigm shift and new leaders during this shift will emerge.
History shows us that tech leaders of old have a habit of falling behind because they are too set in their ways to adapt to a world with new rules.
It might be so that at some point in the not-so-near future, we might need to set the search default to Bing.
How ironic?
Global Market Comments
January 27, 2023
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(JANUARY 25 BIWEEKLY STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(RIVN), ($VIX), (SPX), (UUP), (NVDA), (TLT), (LLY), (AAPL), (RTX), (LMT), (USO), (OXY), (TSLA), (UNG), (MSFT)
CLICK HERE to download today's position sheet.
Below please find subscribers’ Q&A for the January 25 Mad Hedge Fund Trader Global Strategy Webinar broadcast from Silicon Valley in California.
Q: What do you think about LEAPS on Rivian (RIVN)?
A: Yes, I would do those, but a smaller position with closer strike prices. Go to the maximum maturity 2 years out and be conservative—bet on only a 50% rise in the stock. I’m sure it’ll double, but with the LEAPS you’ll have tremendous upside leverage, like 10 to 1, so don’t get greedy. Go for the 500% profit in 2 years rather than the 1,000%, because it is still a startup, and we need economic recovery for startups to get traction. If anything, Tesla (TSLA) will drag this stock back up as it dragged it down. They all move together.
Q: What’s the number of contracts on your $100,000 model portfolio?
A: Our model portfolio basically assumes we have 10 positions of $10,000 each totaling $100,000 in value. You can then change the number of contracts to suit your own private portfolio—take on as much or as little risk as you want. If you’re new. I recommend trading on paper first to make sure you can make money before you use the real thing.
Q: I’m new to this service. What’s the difference between the long-term portfolio and the short-term portfolio?
A: A long term portfolio is a buy-and-forget portfolio, with maybe a 5- or 10-year view. We only change it and make adjustments twice a year so we can average back into the new positions and take profits on the old ones. The main part of this service is usually front-month, and that’s where we take advantage of anomalies in the options market and market timing to make profits 95% of the time. And a big part of the short-term portfolio is cash; we often go 100% cash when there are no trades to be had. It’s actually more valuable knowing when not to trade than when to trade. If you have any more questions, just email customer support at support@madhedgefundtrader.com and we’ll address them individually.
Q: Is it time for a CBOE Volatility Index ($VIX) trade?
A: I hate trading ($VIX). I only do it from the short side; when you get down to these low levels it can flatline for several months, and the time decay eats you to death. I only do it from the short side, and then only the 5% of the time that we’re peaking in ($VIX). The big money is made on the short side, that’s how virtually the entire options trading industry trades this.
Q: Would you be loading up with LEAPS in February?
A: No, it’s the worst time to do LEAPS. You do LEAPS at long-term market bottoms like we had in October, and then we issued 12 different LEAPS. If you get a smaller pullback, there may be LEAPS opportunities, but only in sectors that are near all-time lows, like gold or silver. It depends on the industry and where we are in the market, but basically, you’re looking to do LEAPS at lows for the year because the leverage is so enormous, and so are the potential profits.
Q: Is the increasing good performance a result of your artificial intelligence? Learning from past mistakes?
A: Partly yes, and partly my own intelligence is improving. Believe it or not, when you go from year 54 to 55 in experience in the markets, you understand a lot more about the markets. Sometimes you just get lucky being on the right side of black swan events. Of course, knowing when the market is especially sensitive and prone to black swans is also a handy skill to have.
Q: Is it too late to get into Freeport McMoRan (FCX)?
A: Yes, I wouldn’t touch (FCX) until we get at least a $10 selloff, which we may get in February, so I think the long term target for (FCX) is $100. The stock has nearly doubled since the LEAPS went out in October from $25 a share to almost $50, so that train has left the station. Better off to wait for the next train or find another stock, there are a lot of them.
Q: Where do you park cash in the holding pattern?
A: Very professional hedge fund managers buy 90-day T-bills, because if you keep your cash in your brokerage account—their cash account—and they go bankrupt, it’ll take you 3 years to get your money back in a bankruptcy proceeding. If you own 90-day T-bills and your broker goes bankrupt, they’re required by law to just hand over the T-bills to you immediately. You take delivery of the T-bills, you park them at another brokerage house, and you keep them there. There is no loss of the use of funds.
Q: What about Long term US dollar (UUP)?
A: We go down for 10 years. Falling interest rates are poison for a currency; our rates are probably going to be falling for the next several years.
Q: Thoughts on Tesla (TSLA)?
A: Short term way overbought, we almost got up 60% from the low in weeks, but that’s Tesla, that’s just how it trades. It is the best performing major stock in the market this year. I wouldn’t be looking to go back into it until we drop back, give up half of that gain, get back down to about $135—then it would be a good options trade and a good LEAPS.
Q: Would you be taking profits in Nvidia (NVDA)?
A: I would take like half here and look to buy it back on the next dip because I think Nvidia’s got higher highs ahead of it.
Q: I can’t get a password for the website.
A: Please contact customer support on the homepage and they will set you up immediately. If not, you can call them at (347) 480-1034.
Q: Would you be selling long term positions?
A: No I would not, because if you sell a long term position they’re very hard to get back into; and I’m expecting $4,800 in the (SPX) by the end of the year. Everything goes up by the end of the year, even things you hate. So no, selling is what you did a year ago, now you’re basically looking for chances to get back in.
Q: Would you hold Tesla (TSLA) over this earnings report?
A: No, I sold my position yesterday, at 70% of its maximum potential profit. I don't need substantial selloff; I’m just going to go right back in again.
Q: Have you heard anything about Tesla silicon roof tiles tending to catch fire?
A: No I have not, but if your house got struck by lightning or if someone fired a bullet at it, that might do the trick. Otherwise, you need a huge input of energy to get silicon to catch on fire as it’s a pretty stable element. And if it was already happening on a large scale, you know the media would be absolutely all over it—the media loves to hate Tesla and loves to hate Elon Musk. That certainly would draw attention if it were happening; what's more likely is that fake news is spreading rumors that are not true. That's been a constant problem with Tesla from the very beginning.
Q: Would you open the occidental spread here today?
A: I would, but I would use strike prices $5 lower. I'd be doing the February $50-$55 vertical bull call spread to give yourself some extra protection, given that the general market itself is so high.
Q: Should I be shorting Apple (APPL) here?
A: No, but the smart thing to do is to sell the $160 calls because I don’t think we’ll get up to $160. You could take any extra premium income, and if you don’t get hit this month, keep doing it every month until you are hit, and then you can take in quite a lot of premium income by the time we get to new highs in Apple, possibly as much as $10 or $15. So, that would be a smart thing to do with Apple.
Q: What's your favorite in biotech and big pharma?
A: Eli Lilly (LLY), which just doesn't seem to let anybody in.
Q: If China were to shut down again, would it hurt the stock market?
A: Yes, but not much. The much bigger falls would be in Chinese stocks (which have already doubled since October) not ours.
Q: Thoughts on biotech?
A: Biotech is the new safety trade that will continue. Also, they’re having their secular ramp-up in technology and new drugs so that is also a good long-term bull call on biotech.
Q: What’s the dip in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT)?
A: $4 points at a minimum, $5 is a nice one, $6 would be fantastic if you can get it.
Q: Could we get a trade-up in oil (USO)?
A: Yes, maybe $5 or $10 a barrel. But it’s just that, a trade. Long term, oil still goes to zero. Short term, China recovery gives a move up in oil and that's why we went long (OXY).
Q: You talk about California NatGas being dead, but California gets 51% of its electricity from natural gas, up from 48% in 2018.
A: Yes, but that counts all of the natural gas that gets brought in from other states. In fact, if you look at the longer-term trend over the last 20 years, coal has gone to zero, nuclear is going to zero, hydro has remained the same at about 10%. NatGas has been falling and green sources like wind and solar, have been rising quite substantially. And now, approximately 25% of all the homes in California get solar energy, or 8.4 million homes, and it is now illegal to put gas piping into any new construction. New York is doing the same. That means it will be illegal to do new natural gas installations in a third of the country. So, I think that points to lower natural gas consumption, and in fact, the 22-year target is to take it to zero, which might be optimistic but you never know. All they need is a smallish improvement in solar technology, and that 100% from green sources is doable by 2045, not only for California but for everybody. All energy plays are a trade only, not an investment.
Q: Any thoughts on the implications for the US and Germany providing tanks to Ukraine?
A: You can throw Poland in there, which is also contributing a tank division—so a total of 58 M1 Abrams tanks are going to Ukraine. By the way, I did command a Marine Corps tank battalion for two weeks on my reserve duty, so I know them really well inside and out. They are powered by a turbine engine, have a suspension as soft as a Cadillac, a laser targeting system accurate to three miles even for beginners, and fire recycled uranium shells that can cut through anything like a knife through butter. The answer is the war gets prolonged, and eventually forces Russia into a retreat or a negotiation. Even though the M1 is an ancient 47-year-old design, its track record against the Russian T72 is pretty lopsided. In the first Gulf War, the US destroyed 5,000 T72s and the US lost one M1 tank because he parked on a horizon, which you should never do with a tank. And every driver of a T72 knows that track record. So that explains why Russian tanks have been running out of gas, sugaring their gas tanks, sabotaging their diesel engines, and doing everything they can to avoid combat because of massive fatal design flaws in the T72. We only need to provide about 50 or 60 of the M1 tanks as a symbolic gesture to basically scare the entire Russian tank force away.
Q: Why do you think Elon kept selling Tesla? Did he think it would go lower?
A: Elon thinks the stock’s going to $10,000, but he needed up-front cash to build out six remaining Tesla factories, and for that, he needed about $40 billion, which is why he sold $40 billion worth of stocks last year when it was peaking. He also is sensitive to selling at tops; it’s better to sell stock in with Tesla at an all-time high than at an all-time low, so he clearly times the market to meet his own cash flows.
Q: What about military contractors?
A: I know Raytheon (RTX) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) have a two-year backlog in orders for javelin missiles and stingers, which are now 47-year-old technology that has to be redesigned from scratch. The US just placed an order for a 600% increase in artillery shells for the 155 mm howitzer. I thought we’d never use these again, which is why US stocks for ammunition got so low. But it looks like we have more or less a long term or even permanent customer in Ukraine for everything we can produce, in old Vietnam-era style technologies. How about that? I’m telling the military to give them everything we’ve got because everything we’ve got is obsolete.
Q: When should we buy Microsoft (MSFT)?
A: On the next 10% dip. It’s the quality stock in the US.
Q: Do you place an order to close the spread at profit as soon as you have filled in the trade?
A: You can do that, but it’s kind of a waste of time. Wait until we get close to the strikes; most of the big companies we deal in, you don't get overnight 10% or 20% moves, although it does happen occasionally.
Q: Natural Gas (UNG) prices are collapsing.
A: Correct, because the winter energy crisis in Europe never showed and spring is just around the corner.
Q: On the Tesla (TSLA) LEAPS, what about the January 2025 $600-$610 vertical bull call spread
A: That is way too far out of the money now. I would write that off and go back into it but do something like a January 2025 $180-$190. It has a much higher probability of going in the money, and still an extremely high return. It would be something like 500% if you get in down at these levels.
Q: How do you see Bitcoin short term/long term?
A: I think the loss of confidence in the asset has been so damaging that it may not come back in my lifetime. It could be another Tokyo situation where it takes 30 years to recover, or only recovers when the entire sector gets taken over by the big banks. So, I don’t see any merit in the crypto trade, probably forever. Once you lose confidence in the financial markets, it’s impossible to get it back. And it turns out that every one of these mainline trading platforms was stealing from the customers. No one ever comes back from that in the financial markets.
To watch a replay of this webinar with all the charts, bells, whistles, and classic rock music, just log in to www.madhedgefundtrader.com, go to MY ACCOUNT, click on GLOBAL TRADING DISPATCH or TECHNOLOGY LETTER, then WEBINARS, and all the webinars from the last 12 years are there in all their glory.
Good Luck and Stay Healthy,
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
At 29 Palms in my M1 Abrams Tank in 2000
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
January 25, 2023
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(UNIMPRESSIVE FROM THE BEHEMOTH)
(MSFT)
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.