“Our production system was based on knowledge from former Toyota engineers and we've incorporated a Japanese quality control system too.” – Said CEO of Huawei Ren Zhengfei
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 8, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(YOUR UNCONSCIOUS FUTURE)
(FB), (GOOGL)
This might be one of the most important newsletters you will ever read.
Economies are mainly defined by seismic revolutions, for example, the industrial revolution that cut down simple, archaic jobs to machinery.
As we are on the verge of shuttering the technological revolution that brought us a party bag of treats like the internet, search engines, smartphones and the personal computer, we must brace ourselves for what is next.
Industry 4.0 is the concept of dazzling smart factories augmented by machines connected to a cloud network and software that processes the operations within the system.
The productivity enhancement will boost performance as machines will be able to visualize and surgically solve problems by applying the software that powers it.
Data exchange in manufacturing technologies which include cyber-physical systems (CPS), the Internet of things (IoT), the Industrial Internet of Things (IIOT), and cognitive computing are concepts that will define Industry 4.0.
As income inequality rears its ugly head and becomes center to what politicians run campaigns on, the world must brace for yet another tsunami of unrivaled job loss on levels that we have never seen before.
The social upheaval that economic chaos will create and offer investors monumental investment opportunities.
One of the manifestations of technological evolution is the optimization of business processes through automation, meaning less people are involved in the value creation process.
The global population is on the verge of mushrooming from 7.7 billion people in 2019 to 10.9 billion in 2100.
If you think overpopulation and sharing the world’s resources are a problem in 2019, then wait until 2050 when more people are squeezed out of revenue windfalls.
This effectively means the global middle class will accelerate its demise as the job market will bifurcate into a narrow sliver of clear winners and mostly losers and not the muddied version of what we have now.
The first Industrial Revolution also delivered uncertainty that hung over the whole job market, but the world was diverse enough and had ample resources to absorb the negative impact.
The global overpopulation is connected to the economy in the sense that most babies will be born outside of developed industrial economies and the world will see a fiercer rush to gain access to jobs in places such as London, Frankfurt, New York, Tokyo, and Silicon Valley.
The net effect of A.I. could be debated all day, specifically whether the absolute progress made in the development of industry and the products that revolve around it outweigh the torrent of human suffering that it will cause to billions of people who are not employable in that job market.
With exponential computational power to apply A.I., existing behavior will change in society and new cultures will be created because of it.
Economic value will not correlate to the amount of people like it once was, countries like Japan have dived headfirst into automating as much as possible with the best in class technology in robotics.
The world which we know it in 2019 is in the last legs of a nostalgic phase with baby boomers clinging on to what they know growing up in the 1950s.
Soon, that will be eradicated and Millennials will pour what they know and the fallacies they support into the system that is supported by algorithms and machine learning as the first human generation to be technology natives.
We are on the cusp of transformative shifts in the world.
In the next 25 years, technology will start migrating into the chambers of neuroscience.
Technology has discovered that more than 99.99% of human behavior happens at an unconscious level and that the unconscious brain is 10 times faster than the conscious brain.
While at any point of time, the conscious brain can focus only on one task, the unconscious can easily execute infinitely more.
The aspects of human behavior that the rational world has pinpointed is the conscious mind which is an ill-suited representative of human behavior.
The mechanics of the unconscious brain is stuff out of science fiction in 2019 but that will slowly change.
Consciousness has no understanding of what is happening in one’s own unconscious.
Science will be required to squeeze out a mechanism to discern the type of data humans can produce to mold this future subset of technology.
Modern qualitative techniques must be developed to be able to extract data from this important pool of knowledge.
Corporations are at the forefront of this trend and tech power brokers such as Co-Founder and CEO of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg hopes to one day install a chip into consumers' brain so that consumers can access the global network from the brain.
A scary thought but a thought gaining traction, nonetheless.
Ideally, the morally attuned stakeholders carry out the process of benefitting humankind instead of enriching a select few.
That will also be a battle that will define the next generation.
Increased focus on the unconscious processes will cause headaches for companies and there will likely be a numerical cost placed on the data it generates after companies like Facebook (FB) and Google (GOOGL) ran wild with abusing free personal data for decades.
Monitoring and managing the unconscious processes of consumers and employees will be hard at first and then society must assess if this violates privacy or not.
Unconsciousness works best when humans are sleeping or resting.
How can companies capture data on how well someone is using her unconscious brain?
This will befuddle tech companies until there is a solution.
Paradigm shifting scientific discoveries and human innovations have emanated from unconscious processes of the human brain in the past.
We still understand little about how powerful this data could become.
The current emergence of AI will be rooted purely in consciousness and the data that revolves around it, but the problem is that this data isn’t entirely accurate.
In capturing absolutes about complicated topics with current machine learning techniques, it doesn’t synthesize the fact that many areas of the human world deal in many shades of grey.
That is why A.I. is not that good today.
The next big find is if a company doubles down on the unconscious processes and that leads to groundbreaking discoveries in the understanding of accurate human behavior and thought.
“When you give everyone a voice and give people power, the system usually ends up in a really good place. So, what we view our role as, is giving people that power.” – Said Co-Founder and CEO of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 5, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE BALL IS IN NETFLIX’S COURT)
(NFLX), (DIS), (AAPL), (IQ), (KHC)
Being as volatile as it is, investors are afforded ample opportunity to get into one of the premium tech stocks in the land Netflix (NFLX).
Chasing this one higher is a dangerous thought, as habitual 30% dips is part and parcel of being attached to this supreme online streaming stock.
December of 2018 gave you that sinking feeling when Netflix dropped off a cliff dipping to $260 but spiking after the turn of the year as the Fed swiveled on a dime to save the equity market from implosion.
Let’s make no bones about it, the long-term narrative for Netflix is intact as it’s ever been.
The company simply makes a great product, period, and systematically taps endless demand.
What many cable companies don’t understand is that you cannot make a high-quality film product that wedges in annoying commercials and equally as obnoxious, dictate the window of time in which they should watch the content.
Optionality is value and Netflix has this spot on.
I know many Millennial consumers that would rather jump off a building than subject themselves to commercials.
These factors erode the quality of the product just as if an employer would dictate to one of his or her employees that wanted to take a vacation to Africa.
But the vacation to Africa would have some strings attached.
He or she would only be able to visit at the height of summer in 120-degree Fahrenheit weather while every activity he or she chose to do, would be pre-empted by numerous advertisements that he or she must be shown.
Consumers don’t need these sideshows anymore; the world has developed away from these models and corporates have lost this control.
The loss of corporate control of the consumers is because the internet gives consumers millions of different options at the tip of their fingers.
Tapping into the optionality and the habits that revolve around it is paramount to corporate America.
This is the same reason why big box food companies like Kraft Heinz (KHC) is getting smacked around, consumers have better options and are more aware of them because of technology.
Another example of corporate miscalculation comes in the form of supply chains being redirected from China to South East Asia.
It was clear as day that during my time in China that companies were making a terrible mistake going into China in the first place.
This shows how many corporates are dragged down by a lack of vision and do an awful job of anticipating paradigm shifts that are becoming more common because of the accelerating rate of change of the corporate climate, weather, technology, rule of law, and human migration.
Netflix is effectively blocked from China and China has its own Netflix called iQIYI (IQ), they had no chance from the beginning like Google, Amazon, Facebook, and the many other American tech firms.
Netflix’s business model now has scale working for them and growth numbers will be the main recipients going forward if they focus on high quality content.
That means expect high pay packages to the best media talent in the world.
They can afford to pay a tier 1 actor $50 million per movie because the data buttresses this strategy.
At the same time, Netflix is crushing competition by hoarding the talent with extraordinary pay packages while allowing these highly paid specialists 100% creative control over what they do.
Who would want to work for a company that paid more than double and whose management gave them free reign on creative decisions?
Sounds like an artist’s dream and it’s exactly that for actors like Will Smith who have signed onto Netflix’s project.
I would even suggest that Netflix needs to overpay actors just for the reason of taking them off the market for competitors.
This truly is the lucrative golden age for actors, producers, and directors who are the top 1% of their craft, but for everyone else, it’s a hard slog.
This usually means becoming a tier 1 actor before the migration to online streaming happened.
The picture I am painting is that Netflix’s success and future prospects aren’t about Disney or other competitors, but entirely about them.
He who has the most chips at the table with the best cards is in best position to win and the same goes for Netflix.
The rest of the bunch like Apple (AAPL) and Disney who are late to the party will be feeding off the rest of what Netflix cannot exploit and that’s the best-case scenario.
Disney should be able to have moderate success with its array of great movie, television, and sports content.
I’d be surprised if Disney failed because they possess the ingredients to concoct a delicious cocktail.
Apple has a harder proposition because of the lack of entertainment value in their content. They are still tied to the hardware sales and much of the service sales come from their app store and servicing the hardware.
But Apple does have money, and a lot of it to throw at the problem, but I don’t believe CEO of Apple Tim Cook is the right man to navigate through the travails of the online content world. He’s an operations guy and has never proved anything more than that.
Netflix still has substantial opportunity to grow its brand and the runway is long.
The demand for watching great original movies and television programs without commercials whenever consumers want is still in the first innings.
Even though Disney will remove some non-original content from Netflix’s platform, the content spend on a massive pipeline of new projects will more than fill the void left by Disney’s content.
In fact, Netflix should thank Disney for all those years that Disney allowed them to build their brand through 3rd party premium content like the television program Friends.
I believe Netflix does not need 3rd party content anymore, that is how much Netflix has bolted ahead in the past few years.
The company has introduced price hikes with its 4K premium package going from $14 to $16 per month.
But Netflix is still underpricing itself to the consumer to grab market share, and there is still pricing headway in the future if the company wants it.
In the coming months, Netflix plans to offer more detailed reporting on its metrics and the transparency will give investors even more insight into why this company is brilliant.
I believe the numbers will show that Netflix is absolutely killing it.
As for the trading, Netflix has settled in a range of $320 to $380 and any dips to the $340 range should be quite appetizing.
Add incrementally and use any large dip to drop your cost basis.
Stand aside if you cannot handle heightened volatility.
“Most entrepreneurial ideas will sound crazy, stupid and uneconomic, and then they'll turn out to be right.” – Said Founder and CEO of Netflix Reed Hastings
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 3, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(CHIPS ARE BACK FROM THE DEAD)
(XLNX), (HUAWEI), (AAPL), (AMD), (TXN), (QCOM), (ADI), (NVDA), (INTC)
The overwhelming victors of the G20 were the semiconductor companies who have been lumped into the middle of the U.S. and China trade war.
Nothing substantial was agreed at the Osaka event except a small wrinkle allowing American companies to sell certain chips to Huawei on a limited basis for the time being.
As expected, these few words set off an avalanche of risk on sentiment in the broader market along with allowing chip companies to get rid of built-up inventory as the red sea parted.
Tech companies that apply chip stocks to products involved with value added China sales were also rewarded handsomely.
Apple (AAPL) rose almost 4% on this news and many investors believe the market cannot sustain this rally unless Apple isn’t taken along for the ride.
Stepping back and looking at the bigger picture is needed to digest this one-off event.
On one hand, Huawei sales comprise a massive portion of sales, even up to 50% in Nvidia’s case, but on the other hand, it is the heart and soul of China Inc. hellbent on developing One Belt One Road (OBOR) which is its political and economic vehicle to dominate foreign technology using Huawei, infrastructure markets, and foreign sales of its manufactured products.
Ironically enough, Huawei was created because of exactly that – national security.
China anointed it part of the national security apparatus critical to the health and economy of the Chinese communist party and showered it with generous loans starting from the 1980s.
China still needs about 10 years to figure out how to make better chips than the Americans and if this happens, American chip sales will dry up like a puddle in the Saharan desert.
Considering the background of this complicated issue, American chip companies risk being nationalized because they are following the Chinese communist route of applying the national security tag on this vital sector.
Huawei is effectively dumping products on other markets because private companies cannot compete on any price points against entire states.
This was how Huawei scored their first major tech infrastructure contract in Sweden in 2009 even though Sweden has Ericsson in their backyard.
We were all naïve then, to say the least.
Huawei can afford to take the long view with an Amazon-like market share grab strategy because of possessing the largest population in the world, the biggest market, and backed by the state.
Even more tactically critical is this new development crushes the effectiveness of passive investing.
Before the trade war commenced, the low-hanging fruit were the FANGs.
Buying Google, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Facebook were great trades until they weren’t.
Things are different now.
Riding on the coattails of an economic recovery from the 2008 housing crisis, this group of companies could do no wrong with our own economy flooded with cheap money from the Fed.
Well, not anymore.
We are entering into a phase where active investors have tremendous opportunities to exploit market inefficiencies.
Get this correct and the world is your oyster.
Get this wrong, like celebrity investors such as John Paulson, who called the 2008 housing crisis, then your hedge fund will convert to a family office and squeeze out the extra profit through safe fixed income bets.
This is another way to say being put out to pasture in the financial world.
My point being, big cap tech isn’t going up in a straight line anymore.
Investors will need to be more tactically cautious shifting between names that are bullish in the period of time they can be bullish while escaping dreadful selloffs that are pertinent in this stage of the late cycle.
In short, as the trade winds blow each way, strategies must pivot on a dime.
Geopolitical events prompted market participants to buy semis on the dips until something materially changes.
This is the trade today but might be gone with one Tweet.
If you want to reduce your beta, then buy the semiconductor chip iShares PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXX).
I will double down in saying that no American chip company will ever commit one more incremental cent of capital in mainland China.
That ship has sailed, and the transition will whipsaw markets because of the uncertainty in earnings.
The rerouting of capital expenditure to lesser-known Asian countries will deliver control of business models back to the corporation’s management and that is how free market capitalism likes it.
Furthermore, the lifting of the ban does not include all components, and this could be a maneuver to deliver more face-saving window-dressing for Chairman Xi.
In reality, there is still an effective ban because technically all chip components could be regarded as connected to the national security interests of the U.S.
Bullish traders are chomping at the bit to see how these narrow exemptions on non-sensitive technologies will lead to a greater rapprochement that could include the removal of all new tariffs imposed since last summer.
The risk that more tariffs are levied is also high as well.
I put the odds of removing tariffs at 30% and I wouldn’t be surprised if the administration doubles down on China to claim a foreign policy victory leading up to the 2020 election which could be the catalyst to more tariffs.
It’s difficult to decode if U.S. President Trump’s statements carry any real weight in real time.
The bottom line is the American government now controls the mechanism to when, how, and the volume of chip sales to Huawei and that is a dangerous game for investors to play if you plan on owning chip stocks that sell to Huawei.
Artificial intelligence or 5G applications chips are the most waterlogged and aren’t and will never be on the table for export.
This means that a variety of companies pulled into the dragnet zone are Intel (INTC), Nvidia (NVDA), and Analog Devices (ADI) as companies that will be deemed vital to national security.
These companies all performed admirably in the market following the news, but that could be short lived.
Other major logjams include Broadcom’s future revenue which is in jeopardy because of a heavy reliance on Huawei as a dominant customer for its networking and storage products.
Rounding out the chip sector, other names with short-term bullish price action are Qualcomm (QCOM) up 2.3%, Texas Instruments (TXN) up 2.6%, and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) up 3.9%.
(AMD) is a stock I told attendees at the Mad Hedge Lake Tahoe conference to buy at $18 and is now above $31.
Xilinix (XLNX) is another integral 5G company in the mix that has their fortunes tied to this Huawei mess.
Investors must take advantage of this short-term détente with a risk on, buy the dip trade in the semi space and be ready to rip the cord on the first scent of blood.
That is the market we have right now.
If you can’t handle this environment when there is blood in the streets, then stay on the sidelines until there is another market sweet spot.
“Google is all about information. So the notion of using and presenting information in the right point at the right time to users is what, in essence, describes Google.” – Said Current CEO of Google Sundar Pichai
