When John identifies a strategic exit point, he will send you an alert with specific trade information as to what security to sell, when to sell it, and at what price. Most often, it will be to TAKE PROFITS, but, on rare occasions, it will be to exercise a STOP LOSS at a predetermined price to adhere to strict risk management discipline. Read more
When John identifies a strategic exit point, he will send you an alert with specific trade information as to what security to sell, when to sell it, and at what price. Most often, it will be to TAKE PROFITS, but, on rare occasions, it will be to exercise a STOP LOSS at a predetermined price to adhere to strict risk management discipline. Read more
When John identifies a strategic exit point, he will send you an alert with specific trade information as to what security to sell, when to sell it, and at what price. Most often, it will be to TAKE PROFITS, but, on rare occasions, it will be to exercise a STOP LOSS at a predetermined price to adhere to strict risk management discipline. Read more
Global Market Comments
June 27, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(FRIDAY, JULY 27, 2018, ZERMATT, SWITZERLAND GLOBAL STRATEGY SEMINAR)
(SHORT SELLING SCHOOL 101),
(SH), (SDS), (PSQ), (DOG), (RWM), (SPXU), (AAPL),
(VIX), (VXX), (IPO), (MTUM), (SPHB), (HDGE)
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 27, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(DON'T NAP ON ROKU)
(MSFT), (ROKU), (AMZN), (AAPL), (CBS), (DIS), (NFLX), (TWTR), (SQ), (FB)
Unique assets stand the test of time.
In an era of unprecedented disruption, unique assets' strength begets strength.
This is one of the big reasons the vaunted FANG group has carved out power gains in the business landscape bestowed with a largesse dwarfing any other sector.
As the FANGs trot out to imminent profitability by supercharging massive scale, the emerging tech environment gives food for thought.
These up-and-coming companies fight tooth and nail to elevate themselves to FANG status because of the ease of operating in a duopoly or an outright monopoly.
Microsoft (MSFT) is the closest substitute to an outright FANG. In many ways CEO Satya Nadella has positioned himself better than Facebook (FB) and Apple.
The Mad Hedge Technology Letter has pounced on the newest kids on the block offering subscribers buy, sell or hold recommendations zoning in on the best first and second tier companies in tech land.
The top echelon of the second tier is led by no other than Jack Dorsey and both of his companies, Square (SQ) and Twitter (TWTR), offer idiosyncratic services that cannot be found elsewhere.
I have devoted stories to Dorsey gushing about his ability to build a company and rightly so.
Another solid second tier tech company bringing uniqueness to the table is Roku (ROKU), which I have talked about in glowing terms before when I wrote, "How Roku is Winning the Streaming Wars."
To read the archived story, please click here.
Roku is a cluster of in-house, manufactured, online streaming devices offering OTT (over-the-top) content in the form of channels on its proprietary platform.
The word Roku means six in Japanese and it was chosen because Roku was the sixth company established by founder and CEO Anthony Wood commencing in 2002.
Cord-cutting has been a much-covered topic in my newsletters and this generational shift in consumer behavior benefits Roku the most.
In 2017, 25% of televisions purchased were Roku TVs. According to several reports, more than half of all streaming players purchased last year were Roku players.
This would explain how Roku has shifted its income streams from the physical box itself to selling ads and licensing agreements.
Yes, Roku earns the lion's share of its profits similar to the rogue ad seller Facebook.
Roku does not actually sell anything physical except the box you need to operate Roku, which earned Roku a fixed $30 per unit.
The box serves as the gateway to its platform where it sells ads. Migrating to higher caliber digital businesses like selling ads will stunt the hardware revenue part of its business.
That is all part of the plan.
A new survey conducted regarding fresh cord-cutters demonstrated that out of 2,000 cord-cutters questioned, 70% already had a Roku player and felt no need to pay for cable TV anymore.
Second on the list was Amazon Fire TV at 34%, and Apple TV (AAPL) came in third at 10%.
The dominant position has forced content creators to pander toward Roku TV's platform because third-party content creators do not want to miss out on a huge swath of cord-cutter millennials who are entering into their peak spending years and spend most of their time parked on Roku's platform.
Surveys have shown that millennials do not need a million different streaming services.
They only choose one or two for main functionality, and in most cases, these are Netflix (NFLX) and Amazon (AMZN).
Roku allows both these services to be integrated onto its platform. Cord-cutters can supplement their Netflix and Amazon Prime Video binge with a few more a la carte channels to their preference depending on points of interest.
In general, this is how millennials are setting up their entertainment routine, and all roads don't lead through Rome, but Roku.
If the massive scale continues at this pace, 2020 could be the year profitability explodes through the roof.
The next 18 months should give way to parabolic spikes, followed by consolidation to higher lows in the share price.
When I recommended this stock, its shares were trading at a tad above $32 on April 18, 2018, and immediately spiked to $47 on June 20, 2018.
The tariff sell-off hit most second tier tech companies flush in the mouth. The 5% and occasional 7% intraday sell-offs churn the stomach like Mumbai street food during the height of the Indian summer.
That is part and parcel of dipping your toe into these rising stars.
The move ups are parabolic, but the sell-offs make your hair fall out.
Well, glue your locks back onto your scalp, because we have reached another entry point.
Roku is now trading back down in the low $40 range, and I would bet my retirement fund that Roku will end the year above $50.
This unique company is expected to grow its subscriber base by at least 20% annually, and in five years total subscribers will eclipse 45 million users.
Reinforcing its industry leadership, traditional media companies such as Disney and CBS do not have built-in streaming viewership that comes close to touching Roku.
This has forced these traditional media giants to push their content through Roku or lose a huge amount of the 18 to 34 age bracket for which advertisers yearn.
These traditional players are armed with robust ad budgets, and a good bulk of it is allocated to Roku among others.
For each additional a la carte channel users sign up for on Roku, the company earns a sales commission.
As a tidal wave of niche streaming channels plan to hit the market, the first place they will look to is Roku's platform and this trend will only become stronger with time.
A prominent example was Sling TV, which showed up at Roku's front door first before circling around the rest of the neighborhood.
The runway for Roku's three main businesses of video ads, display ads, and licensing with streaming partners, is long and robust.
The one caveat is the fierce competition from Amazon Fire TV, which puts its in-house content on Amazon front and center when you start the experience.
Roku has head and shoulders above the biggest library of content, and the Amazon effect could scare traditional media for licensing content to Amazon.
We have seen the trend of major players removing their content from streamers because of the inherent conflict of interests licensing content to them while they are developing an in-house business.
It makes no sense to voluntarily offer an advantage to competition.
Roku has no plans to initiate its own in-house original content, and this is the main reason that Amazon and Netflix will lose out on Disney (DIS), CBS (CBS), NBC, and Fox content going forward.
These traditional players categorize Roku as a partner and not a foe.
To get into bed with the traditional media giants means digital ads and lots of them. In terms of a user experience, the absence of ads on Netflix and Amazon is a huge positive for the consumer experience.
But traditional players have the option of bundling ads and content together on Roku making Roku even more of a diamond in the rough.
In short, nobody offers the type of supreme aggregator experience, deep penetration of cord-cutting viewership, and the best streaming content on one graphic interface like Roku.
It is truly an innovative company, and it is in the driver's seat to this magnificent growth story.
It's hard to argue with CEO Anthony Wood when he says that Roku is the future of TV.
He might be right.
If Roku keeps pushing the envelope enhancing its product, it will be front and center as a potential takeover target by a bigger tech company.
Either way, the scarcity value of these types of assets will drive its share prices to the moon, just avoid the nasty sell-offs.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"Google's not a real company. It's a house of cards," - said former CEO of Microsoft Steve Ballmer.
"Without new profits, the market can't go anywhere," said independent research consultant David Darst.
Global Market Comments
June 26, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(MONDAY, JULY 16, 2018, PARIS, FRANCE, GLOBAL STRATEGY LUNCHEON),
(THE MAD HEDGE DICTIONARY OF TRADING SLANG),
(TESTIMONIAL)
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 26, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE CHIP DILEMMA)
(MU), (NFLX), (AMZN), (NVDA), (AMD), (RHT)
The hawks are circling around 2019 chip guidance and that is bad news for chip equities.
Perusing through recent earnings reports, it's not a surprise that investors are uncertain whether tech can bail the rest of the equity market out of this slow macro malaise.
The deterioration in the macro climate has given added dependence to the tech vanguard with investors piling into large cap tech as a flight to quality ensues.
It helps when the tech sector is at the heart of every and any future business.
Names such as Amazon (AMZN) and Netflix (NFLX) are so far above their 50-day and 100-day moving averages that investors will take this mild sell-off as a healthy sign of consolidation.
This also means that traders will pin down Netflix's and Amazon's 50-day and 100-day moving averages as the line in the sand for technical support.
The equity weakness underscores that not all tech names are created equal, and firms without moats have been the leakiest.
Red Hat, the up-and-coming enterprise cloud company, became the scapegoat for mid-cap cloud companies triggering a massive sell-off dipping 14.23% instigated by weak guidance.
It was one of the first cloud snafus for a few quarters fueling an intense risk off surge in cloud and chip names.
It seems not a day goes by where the administration does not announce another provocative countermeasure to the tit-for-tat trade skirmish being played out at the highest levels of government.
Analysts have been trigger-happy as the few bears out there are incentivized to be the first one to call the peak of the chip market.
Careers are made and lost with these bold calls.
As bad as the Red Hat (RHT) miss was to the tech narrative, Micron (MU) made a big splash on its quarterly earnings report boding well for large cap tech names.
Micron beat estimates and surprised on the upside on guidance.
Micron was the first recommendation of the Mad Hedge Technology Letter at a cheap $41.
To read the first article of the Mad Hedge Fund Technology Letter about Micron, please click here.
The stock rocketed to more than $60 at the end of March and the end of May, each time dragged down by big picture headwinds.
Micron is a great long-term hold and the volatility in the stock is not for everyone.
If you want to avoid mind-numbing volatility, then stay away from chip stocks as the boom-bust nature of this sector has created a paranoia bias among analysts generating stock downgrades.
Cloud stocks are succinct, zeroing in on the few growth metrics that matter.
The guesswork involved in chip stocks is the perfect formula that leads to downgrades, because the silicon is distributed to other companies for end products of which are hard to keep tabs.
Hence, the chips industry has experienced a tidal wave of wrong analysts calls that unfairly taint chip stocks and the price action that follows.
Micron's data center cloud revenue, a huge driver of DRAM chips, were up 33% QOQ.
The cornerstone of Micron's business and the reinvestment into cloud products has made this stock best of breed in the chip sector and a top 3 chip stock of the Mad Hedge Technology Letter.
The only other stocks that compare with this outstanding growth story and that are at the cutting edge of innovation are hands down Nvidia (NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) in that order.
Next year's profit margins are the next conundrum for the chip industry.
The huge sums of money required to stay ahead of competition could crush profitability.
Pricing is currently stable but stagnant.
The additional marginal costs could be the reason for investors to flee.
More specifically DRAM pricing for 2019 is under the microscope and soft numbers could spell doom for a company that extracts 71% of its revenue from DRAM chips.
All these negative whispers come at a time where DRAM chips are lifting Micron shares to the heavens. And if there was no international friction, the share price would be substantially higher than it is today.
As of today, the chip industry is still grappling with DRAM supply shortages causing costs per unit to spike.
When you consider that DRAM demand is so healthy that China is once again investigating large cap chip companies, investors should be jumping for joy.
These probes are unfounded and are brought about because DRAM pricing is one of the main inputs to setting up data centers and self-driving technology among other businesses.
If China is forced to pay exorbitant prices for groundbreaking chips that can only be found at American and Korean companies, it makes producing every digital end product costlier. infuriating Chinese management.
SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron comprise more than 90% of the DRAM market, to which Chinese companies need unfettered access.
DRAM chips, unlike other hardware components, are traded on a transparent public market and the probe highlights the building anxiety if Chinese companies are priced out of this sector.
China views the price spike phenomenon in chips as entirely favoring foreign companies that lap up the DRAM profits like money falling from the sky.
Micron carves out half its sales from China, but it is untouchable because loads of chips are required to fuel its global technological supremacy initiative, which is being chipped at by the administration.
CEO of Micron Sanjay Mehrotra has continued to brush off the China threat because he knows Chinese firms cannot fabricate its products.
If this ever happened, kiss the preferential DRAM pricing goodbye, because China would flood the market with substitutes, which has happened to various end markets in the digital and non-digital ecosphere.
The investigation could end in some sort of monetary slap on the wrist and could be payback for blasting a massive hole in Chinese telecommunications hardware conglomerate ZTE's business model.
The administration's heavy-handed response to ban Chinese investment in technology is a long-term victory for Micron, SK Hynix, and Samsung, which have the DRAM market cornered.
These three companies will corner the market even more going forward thanks to help from Washington, widening each moat.
China is not short on funds; it is short on technological expertise because a generation of copy and paste youth cannot compete with the best and brightest minds in Silicon Valley.
Not only can it not compete, it cannot lure the best and brightest to the mainland capitulating local innovation standards.
Its only hope was to pay premium prices for emerging American technology and now that spigot has been turned off.
Technology is in its infancy and is in the early innings of a stunning growth trajectory with a one-way ticket to singularity.
There will be zigs and larger zags on the way. If you thought the Chinese could just ignore Micron and buy from the Koreans, you were wrong.
The relentless demand for DRAM chips is wilder than a British soccer hooligan. Cutting off access to one massive avenue of DRAM chips would be a death knell for any scalable production process that relies on heavy shipments of DRAM chips.
Although markets have been haywire lately, these developments are incredibly bullish, unless China can suddenly produce high-quality chips, which won't be anytime soon.
For the short term, try to pick up the best chip names at yearly lows as tech will not stay suppressed forever.
If you want to scale down the risk, park your funds in the best cloud tech names to weather the storm.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"We've had three big ideas at Amazon that we've stuck with for 18 years, and they're the reason we're successful: Put the customer first. Invent. And be patient," - said founder and CEO of Amazon Jeff Bezos.
