• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: (NFLX)

Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Netflix's Worst Nightmare

Tech Letter

Netflix came out with earnings yesterday and revealed guidance that many industry analysts were dreading.

It appears that Netflix’s relative subscriber growth rate has reached the high-water mark for now.

Competition is rapidly encroaching Netflix’s moat.

In a letter to shareholders, management opined revealing that they do not “anticipate these new entrants will materially affect our growth.”

I am quite bothered by this statement because one would have to be blind, deaf, and dumb to believe that Disney (DIS) or Apple’s (AAPL) new products will not take away meaningful eyeballs from Netflix.

These companies are all competing in the same sphere – digital entertainment.

Papering over the cracks with wishy washy rhetoric was not something I was doing backflips over.

Netflix’s management knew this earnings report had nothing to do with results because everyone wanted to reassess how bad the new entrants would make life for Netflix.

Disney has the content to inflict major damage to Netflix’s business model.

The mere existence of Disney as a rival weakens Netflix’s narrative substantially in two ways.

First, Disney’s entrance into the online streaming game means Netflix will not have a chance to raise subscription prices for the short to medium term.

The last price hike was done in the nick of time and even though management mentioned it followed through “as expected,” losing this financial lever gives Netflix less ammunition going forward and caps EPS growth potential.

Second, another dispiriting factor is the premium for retaining and acquiring original content will skyrocket with more firms jockeying for the same finite amount of actors, producers, directors, and writers.

This particular premium cannot be quantified but firms might try to bid up the cost of certain talent just so the other guy has to foot a bigger bill, this is done in professional sports all the time.

Firms might even take actors off the table with exclusive contracts just to frustrate the supply of content generators.

Uncertainty perpetuates with the future cost of content unable to be baked into the casserole yet, and represents severe downside risk to a stock which trots out an expensive PE ratio of 133.

Growth, growth, and more growth – that is what Netflix has groomed investors to obsess on with the caveat of major strings attached.

This model is highly effective in a vacuum when there are no other players that can erode market share.

Delivering on growth justifies heavy cash burn, and to Netflix’s credit, they have fully delivered in spades.

The strings attached come in the form of steep losses in order to create top of the line content.

Planning to revise down annual cash flow from $3 billion to $3.5 billion in 2019 will serve as a litmus test to whether investors are ready to shoulder the extra losses in the near term.

I found it compelling that Disney Plus will debut at $6.99 per month – add that to the price of Netflix’s standard package of $12.99 and you get a shade under $20.

Disney hopes to dictate spending habits by psychologically grouping Disney and Netflix for both at under $20.

The result of breaching the $20 threshold might push customers into ditching Netflix and sticking with the $6.99 Disney subscription.

Then there is the thorny issue of Netflix’s growth – the quality and trajectory of it.

The firm issued poor guidance for next quarter projecting total paid net adds of 5.0m, representing -8% YOY with only 300,000 adds in the US and 4.7m for the international segment.

Alarm bells should be sounding in the halls when the most lucrative segment is estimated to decelerate by 8% YOY.

Domestic subscriptions deliver higher margins bumping up the average revenue per user (ARPU).

Contrast this with Netflix’s basic Indian package costing $7.27 or 500 rupees and a mobile package of $3.63 or 250 rupees.

In my opinion, domestically decelerating in the high single digits does not justify the additional annual cash burn of half a billion dollars even if you accumulate millions of more Indian adds at lower price points.

This leads me to surmise that the quality of growth is beginning to slip, and Netflix appears to be running into the same type of quagmire Facebook (FB) is facing.

These models are grappling with stagnating or slowing North American growth and an emerging market solution isn’t the panacea.

The Netflix Indian packages are actually considered expensive by local standards meaning that Netflix’s won’t be able to crowbar in price hikes like they did in America.

On the positive side, Netflix did beat Q1 estimates with paid net adds up 9.6 million with 1.74m in the US and 7.86m internationally, up 16% YOY.

Netflix was able to reach revenue of $4.5B, a company record mostly due to the $2 price hike during the quarter in America.

The letter to shareholders simplifies Netflix’s tactics to investors explaining, “For 20 years, we’ve had the same strategy: when we please our members, they watch more and we grow more.”

What this letter doesn’t tell you is that Disney and the looming battle with Netflix will reshape the online streaming landscape.

In simple economics, an increase of supply caps demand, and don’t get sidetracked by the smoke and mirrors, Disney and Netflix are absolutely fighting for the same eyeballs no matter how much Netflix plays this down.

To highlight an example of how these two are directly competing against each other – let’s take the cast of Monica, Chandler, Rachel, Ross, Joey, and Phoebe – in the hit series Friends.

Netflix acquired the broadcasting rights from Warner Bros, who owns Disney, and it was the most popular show on Netflix.

Warner Bros, knowing that Disney were on the verge of rolling out an online streaming product, renewed Netflix for 2019 at $80 million.

Not only were they hand feeding the enemy in broad daylight, but they handicapped their new products as it is about to debut.

Whoever made that decision must go into the hall of shame of boneheaded online content decisions.

Once 2020 rolls around, Disney will finally be able to slap Friends on Disney Plus where it belongs, and the streaming wars will heat up to a fever pitch.

Ultimately, when Netflix brushes off reality proclaiming that if they please viewers with the same strategy, then everything will be hunky-dory, then I would say they are being disingenuous.

The online streaming industry has started to become more complex by the minute and the “same strategy” that worked wonders in a vacuum before must evolve with the times.

At $360, I would short Netflix in the short to medium term until they prove the headwinds are a blip.

If it goes up to $400, it’s a screaming short because accelerating cash burn, poor guidance, decelerating domestic net adds, and a jolt of new competition aren’t the catalysts that will take shares above the heavenly lands of $400, let alone $450.

Netflix is still a fantastic company though – I’m an avid viewer.

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/multimedia.png 822 972 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-04-18 01:06:482019-07-10 21:49:49Netflix's Worst Nightmare
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

April 3, 2019

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 3, 2019
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

()
(GOOGL), (NFLX), (AMZN)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-04-03 08:07:432019-04-03 08:21:44April 3, 2019
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

YouTube’s Big Move Into India

Tech Letter

YouTube has to be the online streaming asset of the year even relegating Netflix (NFLX) to the minor leagues – I’ll tell you why.

India is the new China.

Netflix’s growth strategy is intertwined with India and the management has been extraordinarily vocal about their interests there.

The Indian online streaming renaissance isn’t just fueling Netflix’s rise. In fact, YouTube and its free platform are performing miracles along the Ganges River.

How big is YouTube in India?

YouTube already has 245 million monthly active users in India penetrating 85% of the country’s internet population making India one of its best-performing markets.

The company says more than 60% of its streaming hours in India come from outside the six metros, meaning YouTube has captured the hearts and minds of the rural population who cannot afford to pay for online content.

KPMG forecasts India’s online streaming audience to surpass 550 million by 2023 and YouTube will capture 70% of the 550 million audience.

How did YouTube manage to do this?

First, the content is free with ads allowing rural Indians to join in.

Second, local Indians became hooked on Alphabet’s YouTube with Alphabet (GOOGL) taking an already brilliant platform and supercharged it by tailoring it to popular local influencers that are joining in droves inciting a massive network effect.

Effectively, YouTube attracted these influencers with eye-popping audiences to create organic and original content without the $8 billion Netflix planned content budget in 2019.

YouTube was able to do this by borrowing the Instagram format but transferring it to a more effective video platform model.

Take for instance Nisha Madhulika whose channel has blossomed into one of the most popular Hindi language-based online cooking channels on the internet.

To see one of her videos, please click here.

Her channel has over 6.8 subscribers, yet, accumulating subscribers is one thing, and making money is another.

Past videos that were posted around 2-3 weeks ago have views between 200,000 to 400,000.

These influencers build up revenue by displaying 3rd party ads generated by Alphabet.

A general rule of thumb is that for every 1 million view, ad revenue collected is around $2,000.

Therefore, Nisha and fellow YouTubers with massive audiences are incentivized to pump out high-quality content in high volume.

Scrolling through her numbers, Nisha appears to average around $700 of revenue per video.

She sprinkles in the occasional viral video that garners 1.5 million views which would earn her a tidy $3,000 for a single video.

Not bad and that is before any of the possible marketing opportunities are quantified.

As long as she focuses on the quality of the videos, she can consistently earn $700 per video, then she can do more by partnering with affiliates to sell 3rd party products and receive a commission that is trackable through the links she leaves at the bottom of her videos.

Nisha’s video business works like this, her channel entails producing 3-5 short videos per week producing around 9-11 million views per month adding up to between $18,000-$22,000 in revenue per month.

Remember that while she is accumulating views for newly posted videos, there are still viewers rummaging through her older content demonstrating the beauty of the network effect.

Older videos in Nisha’s case usually add an extra $3,000-$5,000 per month to the bottom line in pure profit.

Many influencers curate, edit, design, and film the content themselves, or subcontract these jobs for a cheap fee.

An influencer could run their YouTube channel for less than $100 per month minus the fees for the equipment.

YouTube has created a powerful platform for content creators to monetize their original content and give them incentives to stick around and build a business.

Netflix has more of a mercenary model where they contract highly paid actors to contribute a finite amount of content for a fee.

YouTube’s model penetrates to the heart of the average person with regular people instead of propping up overpaid Hollywood actors like Netflix.

In many cases, YouTube’s influencers offer live, raw, and personal access, and the data suggests that live, unscripted content are one of the most monetizable types of content on the market due to its original nature and unpredictability.

That is why live sports like the NFL and NBA are easy to sell, monetize, and in great demand. 

I do believe that Netflix has a great product but overpaying for Hollywood’s best talent is not sustainable because the cost-benefit ratio isn’t worth it, which is why Netflix is raising customer prices to monetize the quality of streaming content better.

With other big tech players coming into the market, it will push up the costs for Hollywood talent putting more short-term pressure on their financial model.

Even if Netflix does get the right actors to provide content, they do have their fair share of bad movies.

YouTube’s performance in India will be hard to compete with, even harder when they avoid expensive mistakes, a bad video is simply glossed over and ignored.

Netflix is in the midst of testing a mobile-only Indian subscription package for around $3.64 per month, or 250 Indian rupees, to respond to YouTube’s godlike presence there.

Remember that most rural Indians do not have access to hardware such as computers, laptops, or tablets, and run their lives with cheap Chinese smartphones from Oppo and Vivo.

If you thought $3.64 was a cheap streaming package, then Amazon (AMZN) takes it one step further by offering Amazon prime video for $1.88 per month or 129 Indian rupees.

I like Netflix’s product and the narrative is still intact, but I adore and love YouTube’s transformation that has caught many of us by surprise.

This massive shift wouldn’t be possible without Google’s army of best of breed ad tech.

Even more poignant, YouTube takes direct to consumers to a rawer entry point enhancing the special experience.

The problem with Hollywood talent is that reformulating them onto Netflix’s platform brings them closer to the audience to a certain degree, but not like Nisha’s cooking channel where she can speak directly to the viewer and even interact with her audience in the comment section.

YouTube has mastered this relationship between content creator and audience, and no matter how many times I watch Will Smith’s Bright, I can’t expect him to reply to my comments.

Well, there’s not even a comment section on Netflix’s platform.

In short, Netflix’s Indian strategy is incomplete and I predict that YouTube will extend its lead there because the scalability is well-suited for the Indian rural audience who have little or no discretionary income.

The freemium model wins out again.

Affixing a Netflix grade streaming asset to Alphabet’s booming digital ad business is a match made in heaven.

Buy Alphabet on the dip – YouTube’s outperformance in 2019 will surpass expectations and carry Alphabet shares to new all-time highs this calendar year.

 

 

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/youtube.png 493 972 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-04-03 08:06:492019-04-03 08:21:24YouTube’s Big Move Into India
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

April 3, 2019

Diary, Newsletter, Summary

Global Market Comments
April 3, 2019
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(WHO WILL BE THE NEXT FANG?)
(FB), (AMZN), (NFLX), (GOOGL), (AAPL),
(BABA), (TSLA), (WMT), (MSFT),
(IBM), (VZ), (T), (CMCSA), (TWX)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-04-03 01:07:522019-04-02 17:50:07April 3, 2019
Arthur Henry

Who Will Be the Next FANG?

Diary, Newsletter

FANGS, FANGS, FANGS! Can’t live with them but can’t live without them either.

I know you’re all dying to get into the next FANG on the ground floor, for to do so means capturing a potential 100-fold return, or more.

I know because I’ve done it four times. The split adjusted average cost of my Apple shares is only 25 cents compared to today’s $174, so you can understand my keen interest. My average on Tesla is $16.50.

Uncover a new FANG and the riches will accrue rapidly. Facebook (FB), Amazon AMZN), Netflix (NFLX), and Alphabet (GOOGL) didn’t exist 25 years ago. Apple (AAPL) is relatively long in the tooth at 40 years. And now all four are in a race to become the world’s first trillion-dollar company.

One thing is certain. The path to FANGdom is shortening. It took Apple four decades to get where it is today, Facebook did it in one. As Steve Jobs used to tell me when he was running both Apple and Pixar, “These overnight successes can take a long time.”

There is also no assurance that once a FANG always a FANG. In my lifetime, I have seen far too many Dow Average components once considered unassailable crash and burn, like Eastman Kodak (KODK), General Electric (GE), General Motors (GM), Sears (SHLD), Bethlehem Steel, and IBM (IBM).

I established in an earlier piece that there are eight essential attributes of a FANG, product differentiation, visionary capital, global reach, likeability, vertical integration, artificial intelligence, accelerant, and geography.

We are really in a “What have you done for me lately” world. That goes for me too. All that said, I shall run through a short list for you of the future FANG candidates we know about today.

Alibaba (BABA)

Alibaba is an amalgamation of the Chinese equivalents of Amazon, PayPal, and Google all sewn together. It accounts for a staggering 63% of all Chinese online commerce and is still growing like crazy. Some 54% of all packages shipped in China originate from Alibaba.

The juggernaut has over half billion active users, and another half billion placing orders through mobile phones. It is a master of AI and B2B commerce. There is nothing else like it in the world.

However, it does have some obvious shortcomings. Its brand is almost unknown in the US. It has a huge problem with fakes sold through their sites.

It also has an ownership structure for foreign investors that is byzantine, to say the least. It is a contractual right to a share of profits funneled through a PO box in the Cayman Island. The SEC is interested, to say the least.

We also don’t know to what extent founder Jack Ma has sold his soul to the Beijing government. It’s probably a lot. That could be a problem if souring trade relations between the US and the Middle Kingdom get worse, a certainty with the current administration.

Tesla (TSLA)

Before you bet on a new startup breaking into the Detroit Big Three, go watch the movie “Tucker” first. Spoiler Alert: It ends in tears.

Still, Tesla (TSLA) has just passed the 270,000 mark in the number of cars manufacturered. Tucker only got to 50.

Having led my readers into the stock after the IPO at $16.50, I am already pretty happy with this company. Owning three of their cars helps too (two totaled). But Tesla still has a long way to go.

It all boils down to the success of the $35,000, 200-mile range Tesla 3 for which it already has 500,000 orders. So far so good.

It’s all about scale. If it can produce these cars in sufficient numbers, it will take over the world and easily become the next FANG. If it can’t, it won’t. It’s that simple.

To say that a lot is already built into the share price would be an understatement. Tesla now trades at ten times revenues compared to 0.5 for Ford (F) and (General Motors (GM). That’s a relative overvaluation of 20:1.

Any of a dozen competing electric car models could scale up with a discount model before they do, such as the similarly priced GM Bolt. But with a ten-year lead in the technology, I doubt it.

It isn’t just cars that will anoint Tesla with FANG sainthood. The firm already has a major presence in rooftop solar cell installation through Solar City, utility sized solar plants, industrial scale battery plants, and is just entering commercial trucks. Consider these all seeds for FANGdom.

One thing is certain. Without Tesla, there wouldn’t be s single mass-market electric car on the road today.

For that, we can already say thanks.

Uber

In the blink of an eye, ride sharing service Uber has become essential for globe-trotting travelers such as myself.

Its 2 million drivers completely disrupted the traditional taxi model for local transportation which remains unchanged since the days of horses and buggies.

That has created the first $75 billion of enterprise value. It’s what’s next that could make the company so interesting.

It is taking the lead in autonomous driving. It could also replace FeDex, UPS, DHL, and the US post office by offering same day deliveries at a fraction of the overnight cost.

It is already doing this now with Uber Foods which offers immediate delivery of takeouts (click here if you want lunch by the time you finish reading this piece.)

UberCopters anyone? Yes, it’s already being offered in France and Brazil.

Uber has the potential to be so much more if it can just outlive its initial growing pains.

It is a classic case of the founder being a terrible manager, as Travis Kalanick has lurched from one controversy to the next. The board finally decided he should spend much time on his new custom built 350-foot boat.

Its “bro” culture is notorious, even in Silicon Valley.

It is also getting enormous pushback from regulators everywhere protecting entrenched local interests. It has lost its license in London, the only place in the world that offered a decent taxi service pre-Uber. Its drivers are getting beaten up in Paris.

However, if it takes advantage of only a few of the doors open to it, status as a FANG beckons.

Walmart (WMT)

A few years ago, I was heavily criticized for pointing out that half the employees at my local Walmart (WMT) were missing their front teeth. They have since received a $2 an hour's pay raise, but the teeth are still missing. They don’t earn enough money to get them fixed.

The company is the epitome of bricks and mortar in a digital world with 12,000 stores in 28 countries. It is the largest private employer in the US, with 1.4 million workers, mostly earning minimum wage.

The Walmart customer is the very definition of the term “late adopter.” Many are there only because unlike Amazon, Wal-Mart accepts cash and Food Stamps.

Still, if Walmart can, in any way, crack the online nut, it would be a turbocharger for growth. It moved in this direction with the acquisition of Jet.com for $3 billion, a cutting-edge e-commerce firm based in Hoboken, NJ.

However, this remains a work in progress. Online sales account for only 4% of Walmart’s total. But they could only be a few good hires at the top away from success.

Microsoft (MSFT)

Talk about going from being the 800-pound gorilla to an 80 pound one, and then back to 800 pounds.

I don’t know why Microsoft (MSFT) lost its way for 15 years, but it did. Blame Bill Gates’s retirement from active management and his replacement by his co-founder Steve Ballmer.

Since Ballmer’s departure in 2014, the performance of the share price has been meteoric, rising by some 125% over the past two years.

You can thank the new CEO Satya Nadella who brought new vitality to the job and has done a complete 180, taking Microsoft belatedly into the cloud.

Microsoft was never one to take lightly. Windows still powers 90% of the world’s PCs. No company can function without its Office suite of applications (Word, Excel, and PowerPoint). SQL Server and Visual Studio are everywhere.

That’s all great if you want to be a public utility, which Microsoft shareholders don’t.

LinkedIn, the social media platform for professionals, could be monetized to a far greater degree. However, specialization does come at the cost of scalability.

It seems that the future is for Microsoft to go head to head against next door neighbor Amazon (AMZN) for the cloud services market while simultaneously duking it out with Alphabet (GOOGL).

My bet is that all three win.

Airbnb

This is another new app that has immeasurably changed my life for the better. Instead of cramming myself into a hotel suite with a wildly overpriced minibar for $600 a night, I get a whole house for $300 anywhere in the world, with a new local best friend along with it.

Overnight, Airbnb has become the world’s largest hotel chain without actually owning a single hotel. At its latest funding round in 2017, it was valued at $31 billion.

The really tricky part here is for the firm to balance out supply and demand in every city in the world at the same time. It is also not a model that lends itself to vertical integration. But who knows? Maybe priority deals with established hotels are to come.

This is another firm that is battling local regulation, that great barrier to technological innovation. None other than its home town of San Francisco now has strict licensing requirements for renters, a 30 day annual limitation, and a $1,000 a day fine for offenders.

The downtowns of many tourist meccas like Florence, Italy and Paris, France have been completely taken over by Airbnb customers, driving rents up and locals out.

IBM (IBM)

There was a time in my life when IBM was so omnipresent we thought like the Great Pyramids of Egypt it would be there forever. How times change. Even Oracle of Omaha Warren Buffet became so discouraged that he recently dumped the last of his entire five-decade long position.

A recent 20 consecutive quarters of declining profits certainly hasn’t helped Big Blue’s case. It is one of the only big technology companies whose share price has gone virtually nowhere for the past two years.

IBM’s problem is that it stuck with hardware for too long. An entrenched bureaucracy delayed its entry into services and the cloud, the highest growth areas of technology.

Still, with some $80 billion in annual revenues, IBM is not to be dismissed. Its brand value is still immense. It still maintains a market capitalization of $144 billion.

And it has a new toy, Watson, the supercomputer named after the company’s founder, which has great promise, but until now has remained largely an advertising ploy.

If IBM can reinvent itself and get back into the game, it has FANG potential. But for the time being, investors are unimpressed and sitting on their hands.

The Big Telecom Companies

My final entrant in the FANGstakes would be any combination of the four top telecommunication companies, Verizon (VZ), AT&T (T), Comcast (CMCSA), and Time Warner (TWX), which now control a near monopoly in the US.

There is a reason why the administration is blocking the AT&T/Time Warner merger, and it is not because these companies are consistently cited in polls as the most despised in America. They are trying to stop the creation of another hostile FANG.

Still, if any of the big four can somehow get together, the consequences would be enormous. Ownership of the pipes through which the modern economy courses bestows great power on these firms.

And Then….

There is one more FANG possibility that I haven’t mentioned. Somewhere, someplace, there is a pimple-faced kid in a dorm room thinking up a brand-new technology or business model that will take the world by storm and create the next FANG.

Call me crazy, but I have been watching this happen for my entire life.

I want to thank my friend, Scott Galloway, of New York University’s Stern School of Business, for some of the concepts in this piece. His book, “The Four” is a must read for the serious tech investor.

 

 

 

 

 

Creating the Next FANG?

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/tech-guys.jpg 368 550 Arthur Henry https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Arthur Henry2019-04-03 01:06:312019-04-02 17:47:43Who Will Be the Next FANG?
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

March 29, 2019

Diary, Newsletter, Summary

Global Market Comments
March 29, 2019
Fiat Lux

SPECIAL FANG ISSUE

Featured Trade:

(FINDING A NEW FANG),
(FB), (AAPL), (NFLX), (GOOGL),
(TSLA), (BABA)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-03-29 09:07:252019-03-29 10:51:56March 29, 2019
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

March 25, 2019

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
March 25, 2019
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(APPLE’S BIG PUSH INTO SERVICES)
(AAPL), (GS), (NFLX), (GOOGL), (ROKU)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-03-25 02:07:562019-07-10 21:38:56March 25, 2019
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Apple's Big Push Into Services

Tech Letter

The future of Apple (AAPL) has arrived.

Apple has endured a tumultuous last six months, but the company and the stock have turned the page on the back of the anticipation of the new Apple streaming service that Apple plans to introduce next week at an Apple event.

The company also recently announced a partnership with Goldman Sachs (GS) to launch an Apple-branded credit card.

In the deal, Goldman Sachs will pay Apple for each consumer credit card that is issued.

These new initiatives indicate that Apple is doing its utmost to wean itself from hardware sales.

Effectively, Apple's over-reliance on hardware sales was the reason for its catastrophic winter of 2018 when Apple shares fell off a cliff trending lower by almost 35%.

This new Apple is finally here to save the day and will demonstrate the high-quality of engineering the company possesses to roll out such a momentous service.

Frankly speaking, Apple needs this badly.

They were awkwardly wrong-footed when Chinese consumers in unison stopped buying iPhones destroying sales targets that heaped bad news onto a bad situation.

I never thought that Apple could pivot this quickly.

Apple's move into online streaming has huge ramifications to competing companies such as Roku (ROKU).

In 2018, I was an unmitigated bull on this streaming platform that aggregates online streaming channels such a Sling TV, Hulu, Netflix and charges digital advertisers to promote their products on the platform through digital ads.

I believe this trade is no more and Roku will be negatively impacted by Apple’s ambitious move into online streaming.

What we do know about the service is that channels such as Starz and HBO will be subscription-based channels that device owners will need to pay a monthly fee and Apple will collect an affiliate commission on these sales.

Apple needs to supplement its original content strategy with periphery deals because Apple just doesn’t have the volume to offer consumers a comprehensive streaming product like Netflix.

Only $1 billion on original content has been spent, and this content will be free for device owners who have Apple IDs.

Apple's original content budget is 1/9 of Netflix annual original content budget.

My guess is that Apple wants to take stock of the streaming product on a smaller scale, run the data analytics and make some tough strategic decisions before launching this service in a full-blown way.

It's easier to clean up a $1 billion mess than a $9 billion mess, but knowing Apple and its hallmarks of precise execution, I'd be shocked if they make a boondoggle out of this.

Transforming the company from a hardware to a software company will be the long-lasting legacy of Tim Cook.

The first stage of implementation will see Apple seeking for a mainstay show that can ingrain the service into the public's consciousness.

Netflix was a great example, showing that hit shows such as House of Cards can make or break an ecosystem and keep it extremely sticky ensuring viewers will stay inside a walled pay garden.

Apple hopes to convince traditional media giants such as the Wall Street Journal to place content on Apple's platform, but there has already been blowback from companies like the New York Times who referenced Netflix’s demolition of traditional video content as a crucial reason to avoid placing original content on big tech platforms.

Netflix understands how they blew up other media companies and don’t expect them to be on Apple’s streaming service.

They wouldn’t be caught dead on it.

Tim Cook will have to run this race without the wind of Netflix’s sails at their back.

Netflix has great content, and that content will never leave the Netflix platform come hell or high water.

Apple is just starting with a $1 billion content budget, but I believe that will mushroom between $4 to $5 billion next year, and double again in 2021 to take advantage of the positive network effect.

Apple has every incentive to manufacture original content if third-party original content is not willing to place content on Apple's platform due to fear of cannibalization or loss of control.

Ultimately, Apple is up against Netflix in the long run and Apple has a serious shot at competing because of the embedment of 1 billion users already inside of Apple's iOS ecosystem that can easily be converted into Apple streaming service customers.

If you haven't noticed lately, Silicon Valley's big tech companies are all migrating into service-related SaaS products with Alphabet (GOOGL) announcing a new gaming product that will bypass traditional consoles and operate through the Google Chrome browser.

Even Walmart (WMT) announced its own solution to gaming with a new cloud-based gaming service.

I envision Apple traversing into the gaming environment too and using this new streaming service as a fulcrum to launch this gaming product on Apple TV in the future.

The big just keep getting bigger and are nimble enough to go where internet users spend their time and money whether it's sports, gaming, or shopping.

Apple is no longer the iPhone company.

I have said numerous times that Apple's pivot to software was about a year too late. 

The announcement next week would have been more conducive to supporting Apple’s stock price if it was announced the same time last year, but better late than never.

Moving forward, Apple shares should be a great buy and hold investment vehicle.

Expect many more cloud-based services under the umbrella of the Apple brand.

This is just the beginning.

 

 

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/netflix-mar25.png 564 972 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-03-25 02:06:312019-07-10 21:39:03Apple's Big Push Into Services
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

March 19, 2019

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
March 19, 2019
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(GOOGLE’S AGGRESSIVE MOVE INTO GAMING),
(GOOGL), (AAPL), (FB), (NFLX), (MSFT) (EA), (TTWO), (ATVI)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-03-19 02:07:122019-07-10 21:40:00March 19, 2019
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Google’s Aggressive Move Into Gaming

Tech Letter

The saturation of tech is upon us.

That is the takeaway from Google’s (GOOGL) hard pivot into gaming.

The goal of their new gaming service is to become the Netflix (NFLX) of gaming allowing gamers to skip purchasing third-party consoles and playing games directly from an Android-based Google device.

Middlemen in the broad economy are getting killed and this is the beginning.

What we are really seeing is a last-ditch effort to protect gaming consoles - these devices will become extinct in less than 20 years boding ill for companies such as Sony and Nintendo

The cloud is still all the rage and companies such as Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOGL), and Apple (AAPL) have the natural infrastructure in place to offer cloud-based gaming solutions.

Phenomenon such as internet game Fortnite have shown that consoles are outdated and relying on the cloud as a fulcrum to extract gaming revenue by way of add-ons and in-game enhancements will be the way forward

Another key takeaway from this development is that passive investment is dead, even more so in tech, where these big tech companies are starting to bleed over into each other's territory.

This dispersion will create opportunity and pockets of weakness.

I blame this on a lack of innovation with companies still trying to extract as much as they can from the current smartphone-based status quo which has pretty much run its course.

Technology is itching for something revolutionary and we still have no idea what that new idea or device will be.

The rollout of 5G is promising and companies will need some time to adapt to this super-fast connection speed.

In either case, I can tell you the revolution won’t include foldable smartphones.

In 2018, the gaming industry flourished on accelerating momentum by registering over $136 billion in sales, and the revenue growth rate is already about 15% and increasing.

Naturally, companies such as Amazon and Google want a piece of this action and are hellbent on making inroads in the gaming environment such as Amazon's ownership of Twitch, which is a game streaming service where viewers can watch live tournament-style competitions proving extremely popular with Generation Z.

I applaud this move by Google because they already have proved they can execute on certain mature assets such as YouTube which has become the Netflix replacement of 2019.

Doubling down in the gaming sector would be a bonus as they search a second accelerating revenue driver that will dovetail nicely with the overperformance in YouTube this year.

It’s even possible that YouTube could be modified to support live stream gaming, certainly various synergistic dynamics are at play here.

Even if they fail - it's worth the risk.

Revenue extraction will be painful for certain companies like Facebook (FB) in this new environment, who has seen a horde of top executives abort after the company drastically changed directions, believing the company is on a suicide mission to fines and more regulatory penalties.

I've mentioned in the past that Facebook no longer commands the same type of employee brand recognition they once cultivated.

Facebook will find a tougher time to find the right people they need to execute their private chat plan, by linking the likes of WhatsApp, Instagram, and Facebook Messenger.

This is a high-risk high-reward proposition that could end up with Facebook's co-founder Mark Zuckerberg in tears if regulators give him the cold shoulder, and that is why many executives who are risk-adverse want to cash in now because they sink with the Titanic.  

Not only are gaming assets becoming saturated, but the general online streaming environment is attracting a tsunami of supply all at one time.

Online content is already veering into the same type of pricing structures that cable offered traditional customers.

Investors will have to ask themselves, how much will the average consumer spend in content-based entertainment per month?

My guess is not more than $100 per month.

The saturation will cause tech companies to become even more draconian.

Be prepared for some more epic in-fighting until a new gateway of internet monetization opens up.

There has never been a better time to be a tactical and active investor in tech.

The Fang trade has splintered off with each company facing unpredictable futures.

Unearthing value will become more difficult because these traditional bellwether tech stocks have decoupled and aren't going straight up anymore.

Those zigs and zags will still be buttressed by a secular tailwind of the migration to digital, but there are certain winners and losers that will result of this.

Apple announcing a new streaming product is proof that these Silicon Valley tech firms are desperate for new profit drivers as the woodchips that fuel the fire start to run noticeably short on supply.

At the bare minimum, this looks disastrous for the traditional gaming companies of Electronic Arts (EA), Take-Two Interactive (TTWO), and Activision (ATVI) whose shares have been effectively shelved due to the Fortnite revolution.

EA has fought back with their own Fortnite lookalike called Apex Legends which showed a Fortnite-like trajectory sucking in 10 million players in the first 72 hours.

The stock exploded 16%, signaling this is the new way forward for gaming companies.

As a whole, these traditional gaming studios simply don’t have the firepower to compete with the big boys, let alone possess a strong cloud infrastructure.

 

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/MSFT-mar19.png 568 974 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-03-19 02:06:092019-07-10 21:40:11Google’s Aggressive Move Into Gaming
Page 21 of 33«‹1920212223›»

tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with Mad Hedge Fund Trader (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastytrade pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastytrade and/or any of its affiliated companies. Neither tastytrade nor any of its affiliated companies is responsible for the privacy practices of Marketing Agent or this website. tastytrade does not warrant the accuracy or content of the products or services offered by Marketing Agent or this website. Marketing Agent is independent and is not an affiliate of tastytrade. 

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • FAQ
Scroll to top