• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: (TWTR)

Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Algorithms Run Wild

Tech Letter

Don’t underestimate trading algorithms.

The “Buy the Dip” psychology is broken and computerized trading has completely flooded the market with its personality.

That is exactly the dynamic of the current tech market, and it will mountain of generous offerings to reverse the trend in the form of monstrous stimulus and cash handouts.

As we entered 2020, the sentiment was sky-high, geopolitical tensions relatively calmed and three recent interest-rate cuts from the Federal Reserve drove tech stocks to record levels.

For 10 years, traders and the algorithms they harnessed were handsomely rewarded by aggressively betting against elevated volatility.

Cogent chart trends are the algorithms’ lustful partner in bed and now that every single short-term model is flashing sell, sell, sell - there isn't much bulls can do to fight back.

Many tech hedge funds have settled on similar conclusions - the best defense right now is unwinding portfolios to return to cash.

Incessant margin calls roiling any logical strategy has struck fear into many traders who levered up 10X.

What you could possibly see is the Minsky moment: That stability ultimately breeds instability because the only input in which becomes the difference make is volatility producing massive violence on upside and downside moves.

The ones who can absorb elevated risk are nibbling and unleveraged hoping to time the turn when stocks finally react positively to good data.  

The current battle in the fog of war is that of two different economic scenarios that have direct influence in which ways the algorithms flip – either shutdown the country ala Wuhan, China for an extended period of time or send the troops back to work.

Hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman gave his 2-cents restating his passionate plea for a 30-day-shutdown to fight the coronavirus pandemic.

Former Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein is in favor of sending back the asymptomatic younger generation workers sooner than later.

Initially, Blankfein gave his backing for “extreme measures” in order to flatten the curve, but promoted healthy workers returning “within a very few weeks.”

Blankfein's argument rests on that if people don’t go back to work, the economy might become too damaged to recover from inciting another crash.

This contrasts starkly with Ackman’s idea of “testing, testing, testing”, which would theoretically dismantle the potency of the virus but take longer for the economy to restart.

U.S. President Donald Trump has relayed his desire to open up business by Easter Sunday.

So as mostly professional politicians hash out a towering aid package of over $2 trillion, firms will get more of an indicator of how and when the business world opens up again.

Trading algorithms are on a knives edge because of the uncertainty – until they are illegal – it is something we are stuck with.

These trading formulas are preset based on biases that start with a series of inputs and the most critical input is volatility or better known as the fear index.

If the lockdowns are extended, the flood of negative news will force algorithms to sell on the extra volatility.

When things go bonkers, many of these preset formulas sell which exacerbates the down move further simply because more than enough people have the same preset algorithm.

Cutting position size when market volatility explodes is not a farfetched theory and is quite a common trading nostrum.

Even if many of these trades would be good long-term bets, many trading algorithms are focused on short-term trades and by this, I mean milliseconds and not days.

Another input into trading algorithms are Twitter feeds.

The platform is scraped for keywords from mass media news sources and synthesized into a specific output that is fed into a computer algorithm.

These headlines offer insight into what the sentiment is for the trading day – negative, positive, or neutral.

This scraping of data is especially relevant in today’s chaotic trading world where 10% moves up or down in one day is the new normal.

Because of Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform, many of the big banks have shuttered trading operations hurting the market’s liquidity situation causing spreads to widen and down moves to accelerate.

But now that the Fed has landed the Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk on the helipad and the money is waiting to helicopter down as they have announced “unlimited” asset buying and guaranteeing of corporate bonds to aid financial markets.

How does computerized trading roil markets?

Here is an example.  A recent trading day included more than $100 billion of selling, the worst week since the financial crisis and was triggered by a hedging strategy called “vol targeting”—using volatility as a central input in trading decisions—and other systematic tactics.

Funds making decisions based on volatility, including some with names such as volatility-targeting funds and risk-parity funds, have risen in popularity.

Risk-parity funds manage an estimated $300 billion.

Risk parity is an approach focused on allocation of risk, usually defined as volatility, rather than allocation of capital.

That is what we have now – a cesspool of risk parity hedge funds layered by high frequency funds layered by short/long vol funds layered by arbitrage funds all levered 15X.

The take into consideration that they are supercharged by massive volume-based computer algorithms and trying to head for the exit door at the same time.

Ironically, this could be one of catalysts for shares to recalibrate and head back up north as traders start to front-run the peak of the health crisis.

Let’s hope that it happens sooner than later and that the government doesn’t manage to screw up delivering the helicopter money.

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-03-25 08:12:252020-05-11 13:21:20Algorithms Run Wild
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

March 11, 2020

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
March 11, 2020
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(THE BEST LEAPS IN MID-SIZED TECH)
(TWTR), (EBAY)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-03-11 10:04:002020-03-11 10:28:44March 11, 2020
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

The Best LEAPS in Mid-Sized Tech

Tech Letter

Successful investors rarely disclose their modus operandi.

The truth is that success comes in all shapes and sizes.

Many take the volatility index and aggressively short it until death hoping to avoid the “big one” that wipes them out.

Picking up pennies in front of the steam roller on steroids works until it doesn’t.

Conversely, long-term investors with an eagle-eye view of the underlying trends in the economy, society, and the tech sector will let the market crash come to them only to slip in a few long-dated long-term equity anticipation securities (LEAPs) in their favorite names.

The reasons are very obvious. The risk on a LEAP is limited. You can’t lose any more than you put in. At the same time, they permit enormous amounts of upside leverage.

Two years out, the longest maturity available for most LEAPS, allow plenty of time for the world and the markets to get back on an even keel.

Depressions, pandemics, tsunamis, oil shocks, interest rates going to 0, and political instability all fall away within two years and pave the way for dramatic stock market reversals.

You just put them away and forget about them. Wake me up when it is 2022.

There is a smarter way to execute this portfolio. Put in throw-away crash bids at levels so low they will only get executed on the next 1,000 point down day in the Nasdaq Index which could happen any day.

You can play around with the strike prices all you want. Going farther out of the money increases your returns but raises your risk as well. Going closer to the money reduces risk and returns, but the gains are still a multiple of the underlying stock.

Committing to risk when there is blood in the streets seems scary at the time, but is often the origins of fruitful trades that get fully harvested down the road.

I am zeroing in on two companies that aren’t the vaunted FANGs but are positioned right behind their back shoulder and whose share prices are poised to shoot higher long before the January 2020 expiration.

Considering we have just had an eye-gouging 20% sell-off in tech shares, there is the argument that tech shares are on discount in the shop window as we speak.

The two companies who fit the bill are Twitter (TWTR) and eBay (EBAY).

What do they have in common?

Both are being bullied and cajoled by Elliott Management, the vulture fund who cut its teeth on profiting off of distressed debt but have now ventured into the realm of public markets to only bring the same type of aggressiveness and bottom line mentality to the octagon cage.

They exist solely to deliver shareholders higher returns and brutally squeeze growth out of underperforming assets.

There is no empathy or feel-good factor at Elliot.

They have identified Twitter and eBay as low-hanging fruit in the tech ecosystem and have adamantly demanded that management get their finger out and improve its execution.

I agree with Elliot that Twitter and eBay have failed to find the parabolic growth that something like a Facebook has experienced.

Elliot Management is here to set things straight, after they quietly acquired a 4% stake in Twitter, and that couldn’t be more evident when they tried to oust CEO of Twitter Jack Dorsey a few days ago.

The vulture fund was already peeved that Dorsey was splitting time with his other company Square and imagine how they felt when Dorsey announced he would seek to spend the year in Africa working remotely.

The outcry and backlash were considerable, and the strong-arm tactics have worked out beautifully for Elliot Management who scored an extra 3 seats on Twitter’s board for agreeing to allow Dorsey to keep his job.

On top of that, Dorsey agreed to expand Twitter’s user base by at least 20% this year, achieve accelerating revenue growth, and gain market share as a digital advertiser.

In effect, Elliot Management put Dorsey in his place, and they have had the same type of end result in eBay’s management ranks as well.

Under almost any scenario, it’s hard to fathom that these two tech companies will have share prices lower by January 2022.

Granted, short-term gyrations are ripe for volatility as the coronavirus wreaks havoc on the sensitive minds of investors and traders, but the risk/reward in these two LEAPs are overwhelmingly favorable.

I would suggest looking at the $23 strike price for Twitter and eBay and executing a limit order near the bid price.

At the $23 strike price, 7 contracts would cost around $10,000 for Twitter’s LEAPs and 8 contracts for eBay.

Executing limit orders is necessary otherwise you will get gouged on the spread nullifying the leverage that is critical to making this trade a homerun.

If the market swan dives, there is a high chance of getting an order filled at the price you are comfortable with.

There is a strong likelihood of cashing out in January 2022 – what’s not to like about that?

Twitter’s Jan 2022 LEAP:

Twitter’s Jan 2022 LEAP:

 

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-03-11 10:02:232020-05-11 13:17:03The Best LEAPS in Mid-Sized Tech
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

February 21, 2020

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 21, 2020
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(WHY THE GOVERNMENT IS GUNNING FOR GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK)
(FB), (GOOGL), (TWTR), (ADBE), (FTNT), (EBAY)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-02-21 04:04:102020-02-21 05:44:00February 21, 2020
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Why the Government is Gunning for Google and Facebook

Tech Letter

Google (GOOGL) and Facebook (FB) are dominant to the extent that the U.S. administration is hoping to dismantle them.

The two companies enjoy a flourishing duopoly and guzzle up digital ad dollars.

Governments around the world are scratching their heads attempting to figure out how to put a dent in these fortresses and so far, have been unsuccessful.

Big tech has made governments look bad, to say the least, and their response has been even more shambolic.

Alphabet installed Google CEO Sundar Pichai as the top decision-maker for all Alphabet assets preparing for the onslaught of digital privacy headwinds and regulation that the E.U., U.S., and everyone else will throw at them.

Luckily, they do not need to deal with the Chinese communist party as big tech minus Apple was effectively banned years ago.

What’s on Google and Facebook’s plate right now?

Attorney General William Barr has pointed the finger at these two platforms for hiding behind a clause that gives them immunity from lawsuits while their platforms carry material promoting illicit and immoral conduct and suppressing opinions.

Barr is currently looking into potential changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which was passed in 1996 and has been also referred to as the supercharger to tech riches.

What could eventually come of this?

Barr could decide for the Justice Department to explore ways to limit the provision, which protects internet companies from liability for user-generated content.

This could open up Google and Facebook to higher costs of managing content on their platforms and lawsuits related to malcontent in which they fail to remove.

Even though platforms love to market that they actively thwart bad actors, at the end of the day, they aren’t on the hook for what happens.

Massive alterations could fundamentally weaken their business models and force them to review each word and photo that is thrown upon their platform.

They have already hired an army of hourly paid contractors, but at their massive scale, content is simply impossible to smother.

Content generators understand how to sidestep machine learning algorithms which are based on backdated data, meaning they would not be able to catch a new iteration of past content.

Absolving themselves of any responsibility for policing their platforms has been an important catalyst in the outperformance in shares for both Facebook and Google.

The social side of this has cringeworthy unintended consequences.

The Computer & Communications Industry Association, a tech trade group that counts Google and Facebook as members want the government to stay out of it as they believe they are overreaching.

Government has been slowly making inroads in combatting the strength of these digital platforms, and the first successful foray was when Congress eliminated the liability protection for companies that knowingly facilitate online sex trafficking.

Big tech won’t go with a whimper and they will propose a range of changes to avoid direct damage to their business model such as raising the bar a smidgeon on which companies can have the shield, to carving out other laws negating attempt to weaken their platforms, to delaying the repealing of Section 230.

There is too much shareholder value on the line and as the coronavirus rears its ugly head, it’s ironic that investors perceive safety in not only the U.S. dollar but in the vaunted FANG tech group.

Ultimately, the math wins out and these companies with gargantuan earnings can weather any storm with a moat as wide as ever.

It’s to the point that a $10 billion fine is a massive victory, and what other group of companies can boast about that?

We can only trade the market we have in front of us and not the one we want.

I pulled the trigger on a Google call spread and I believe this narrow group of power tech players and their partners in crime cloud stocks of the likes of Twitter (TWTR), eBay (EBAY), Fortinet (FTNT), Adobe (ADBE), and a few others will hoist the market on its back like I predicted it would at the beginning of the trading year.

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-02-21 04:02:152020-05-11 13:13:05Why the Government is Gunning for Google and Facebook
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

February 14, 2020

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 14, 2020
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(DATA TELLS THE WHOLE STORY)
(FB), (GOOGL), (NFLX), (AMZN), (EBAY), (TWTR)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-02-14 10:04:552020-02-14 10:37:44February 14, 2020
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Data Tells the Whole Story

Tech Letter

Behavioral trends have a sizable say in which tech companies will outperform the next and a recent report from SimilarWeb offers insight into how much users navigate around the monstrosity known as the internet.

The optimal way to comprehend the trends are from a top-down method by absorbing the divergence between desktop traffic and mobile traffic.

It’s no secret that the last decade delivered consumers a massive leap in mobile phone performance in which tech companies were able to neatly package applications that acted as monetization platforms by offering software and services to the end-user.

Thus, it probably won’t shock you to find out that desktop traffic is down 3.3% since 2017 as users have migrated towards mobile and the trend has only been exaggerated by the younger generations as some have become entirely mobile-only users.

All told, the 30.6% expansion in mobile traffic has penalized tech firms who have neglected mobile-first strategies and one example would be Facebook (FB), who even though has a failing flagship product in Facebook.com, are compensated by Instagram, who is showing wild growth numbers.  

The fact that mobile screens are smaller than desktop screens means that users are staying on web pages not as long as they used to – precisely 49 seconds to be exact.

This trend means that content generators are heavily incentivized to frontload content and scrunch it up at the top of the page. This also means that sellers who don’t populate on Google’s first page of search results are practically invisible.

The high stakes of internet commerce are not for the faint of heart and numerous companies have complained about algorithm changes toppling their algorithm-sensitive businesses.

Even using a brute force analysis and investing in companies that are in the top 15 of internet traffic, then the companies that scream undervalued are Twitter (TWTR) and eBay (EBAY).

Twitter is a company I have liked for quite a while and is definitely a buy on the dip candidate.

The asset is the 7th most visited property on the internet behind the likes of Instagram, Google, Baidu, Wikipedia, Amazon, and Facebook.

This position puts them just ahead of Pornhub.com, Netflix, and Yahoo.

And if you take one step back and analyze traffic from the top 100 sites, traffic is up 8% since 2018 and 11.8% since 2017 averaging 223 billion visits per month.

Rounding out the top 15 is eBay who I believe is undervalued along with Twitter - these two are legitimate buy and holds.

Ebay was the recipient of poor management for many years and they are now addressing these sore points.

Certain content is suitable for mobile such as adult sites, gambling sites, food & drink, pets & animals, health, community & society, sports, and lifestyle.

And just over the last year or two, other categories are gaining traction in mobile that once was dominated by desktop such as news and media, vehicle sites, travel, reference, finance, and others.

Many consumers are becoming more comfortable at doing more on mobile and spending more to the point where people are making large purchases on their iPhones.

The biggest loser by far was news - they are losing traffic in droves.

Traffic at the top 100 media publications was down 5.3% year-over-year from 2018 to 2019, a loss of 4 billion visits, and down by 7% since 2017.

Personally, I believe the state of the digital news industry is in shambles, and Twitter has moved into this space becoming the de facto news source while pushing the relevancy of news sites down the rankings.

Facebook and Twitter are essentially undercutting the news by forcing news companies to insert them between the reader and the news company because they have strategized a position so close to the user’s fingertips.

The negative sentiment in news is broad based on popular news, entertainment news and local news all showing decreases of more than 25%.

Finance and women’s interest news categories are the only ones showing positive traffic growth.

The state of internet traffic growth supports my underlying thesis of the big getting bigger and the subsequent network effect stimulating further synergies that drop straight down to the bottom line.

The top 10 biggest sites racked up a total of 167.5 billion monthly visits in 2019, up 10.7% over 2018 and the remaining 90 largest sites out of the top 100 only increased 2.3%.

This has set the stage for just five gargantuan tech firms to become worth more than $5 trillion or 15.7% of the S&P 500’s market value and 19.7% of the total U.S. stock market’s value.

Now we have real data backing up my iron-clad thesis and these cornerstone beliefs underpins my trading philosophy.

Many of the biggest wield a two-headed monster like Google who has Google.com and YouTube video streaming and Facebook, who have Facebook.com and Instagram.

It doesn’t matter that Facebook has lost 8.6% of traffic over the past year because Instagram compensates for Facebook being a poor product.

And if you are searching for another Facebook growth driver under their umbrella of assets then let’s pinpoint chat app WhatsApp who experienced 74% year-over-year traffic.

Beside the news sites, other outsized losers were Yahoo’s web traffic shrinking by 33.6% and Tumblr, which banned adult sites in 2018, leading to a 33% loss in traffic.

If I can sum up the data, buy the shares of companies who are in the top 15 of internet traffic and be on the lookout for any dip in eBay or Twitter because they are relatively undervalued.

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/monthly-traffic.png 452 1056 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-02-14 10:02:532020-05-11 13:12:49Data Tells the Whole Story
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

February 7, 2020

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 7, 2020
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(TWITTER’S GROWTH DOESN’T DISAPPOINT)
(TWTR)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-02-07 10:04:282020-02-07 09:29:07February 7, 2020
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Twitter's Growth Doesn't Disappoint

Tech Letter

Twitter is one of my favorite 2nd tier tech stocks and readers should get into this name on any meaningful dip.

Ironically, “growth” still matters for this company, but it is also profitable which partly offsets investor’s lust for pure user growth.

Remember in the Pre-WeWork apocalypse era, every tech firm was expected to grow irrespective of whether the growth was quality or septic.

Well, Twitter’s financials make sense in many ways and they also benefit from scarcity value.

There is simply no other company that does what Twitter does.

The company has also cleaned up its userbase purging the toxic elements that roil the good spirit of network communication and the trust in the platform, but this could still be improved on.

Nefarious chatbots, fake accounts, deep fakes, and bad actors are actively banished from the platform, and I can confirm that Twitter does a lot more than Facebook on this front.

Buttressed by a string of continuous profitable quarters, Twitter celebrated its best user growth quarter ever.

Even though they fell short on earnings per share, shares were up a Himalayan 17% intraday.

EPS was slightly lower than expected by 4 cents but the 25 cents per share is not the end of the world because Twitter’s mojo doesn’t come in the form of profits.

A more critical milestone was overall top line revenue that saw Twitter finally surpass the $1 billion mark at $1.01 billion vs. $996.7 million expected.

Twitter is finally becoming a big company and will benefit from the network effects and advantages offered to these precious few.

The highlight of the report was easily the Monetizable Daily Active Users (mDAUs) of 152 million which was 5 million more than expected.

The 21% mDAUs expansion is the number that shines brightest and it’s only the third time Twitter has reported mDAUs alone, rather the industry-standard monthly active users (MAUs) it previously reported.

Twitter certainly is still in hyper-growth mode as the company announced plans to build a new data center and add headcount by 20% during the year, which would be about 960 employees on top of the 4,800 it employed by the end of 2019.

Twitter CFO Ned Segal said, “When you add 26 million people to the service when more than half of it is tied directly to product improvements, you build a confidence to continue to execute against your strategy and the execution we’ve been able to deliver over the last few years.”

CEO of Twitter Jack Dorsey plans to work remotely later this year; addressed his previously announced plans to move to Africa for up to six months while running the business, he said he test ran a heavy travel schedule last year and management was able to keep up with the work.

Twitter dropped 20% on the last earnings report due to issues with its Mobile Application Promotion (MAP) product that damaged its ability to target ads and share measurement data with partners, but the bleed-over effect has been largely dealt with.

The technical issue resulted in a short-term 4% revenue drop and guidance won’t be affected moving forward.

Twitter will also carry out an ad server revamp in the first half of 2020 because advertiser sentiment remains strong.

Total ad engagements grew 29% in the quarter driven by improved clickthrough rates and increased impressions due to audience growth.

Cost per engagement fell 13% because of the shift to video ad formats.

Twitter continued to take the moral high road by eliminating political ads because management said it would not be “credible” for Twitter to convince users it’s committed to preventing the spread of misinformation while allowing advertisers to pay the company to target users with political ads.

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-02-07 10:02:272020-05-11 13:12:13Twitter's Growth Doesn't Disappoint
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

May 21, 2019

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 21, 2019
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(HUAWEI HITS THE FAN)
(HUAWEI), (MU), (NVDA), (GOOGL), (FB), (TWTR), (APPL)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-05-21 01:04:532019-07-11 13:03:43May 21, 2019
Page 7 of 12«‹56789›»

tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with Mad Hedge Fund Trader (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastytrade pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastytrade and/or any of its affiliated companies. Neither tastytrade nor any of its affiliated companies is responsible for the privacy practices of Marketing Agent or this website. tastytrade does not warrant the accuracy or content of the products or services offered by Marketing Agent or this website. Marketing Agent is independent and is not an affiliate of tastytrade. 

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • FAQ
Scroll to top