(AAPL) Archives

What Happened When Apple Entered the Dow?

Apple holders (AAPL) were ecstatic and even apoplectic when they heard that their beloved company would be joining the Dow Average last year.

The move required thousands of portfolio managers to add Apple to their portfolios, like the $32 billion worth of Dow index managers, whether they wanted to or not. From then on it would be illegal for them not to own Apple.

At the very least it put the fear of Jobs into moneymen everywhere, especially if the Dow is the benchmark they are measured against.

The world?s now second largest listed company replaced tired and flagging AT&T (T), one of my perennial favorite short positions.

The symbolism couldn?t be more evident. A former monopoly with a literally rusting infrastructure is getting booted for iPhones, iPads, iTunes, Apps and the Cloud. Oh, how the mighty have fallen.

AT&T was one of the oldest Dow stocks, joining the closely followed index in 1916. The new listing then had a symbolic move of its own, taking place the year after the first-ever transcontinental telephone call was placed.

Who made that call? Alexander Graham Bell in New York telephoned his former assistant, Thomas Watson, in San Francisco in a replay of the first phone call in history 50 years earlier in 1876, from room to room at their lab. ?Mr. Watson, come here, I want to see you,? the first words ever uttered on a phone line, were repeated once more.

AT&T, or ?Ma Bell? as it was known, lost its listing in 2004 after it merged with SBC Communications. It was reinstated a year later when the new firm?s name was changed back to AT&T.

However, Apple shareholders should be careful what they wish for.

There is not exactly a great track record for share price performance after a company joins the Dow, especially a technology stock.

In 1999, Microsoft (MSFT) fell 43% after becoming a Dow 30 stock, while Intel (INTC) shed 52%. Cisco Systems (CSCO) lost 16% after joining the club in 2009.

The problem is that Apple entered the index after a meteoric 18 month, 130% run up. So the Dow, having missed the rise in Apple on the upside, fully participated on the downside in the stock meltdown that followed.

Apple is the second largest component in the Dow, with a hefty $575 billion market capitalization. This means that future Dow corrections will be bigger and more ferocious than they would have been without Apple and with boring AT&T.

The volatility of the lead index has just gone up, a lot.

I remember too well that the Japanese made a similar blunder in 2000. The government wanted to have a national stock index that reflected the economy of the future, not of the past.

They had watched with great envy America?s NASDAQ hog the global spotlight, soaring from 1,000 to 5,000 in just a couple of years.

So what did these geniuses do? They reconstituted the Nikkei Average from a 90% boring industrial, 10% technology index to a 50/50 weighting. And they did this mere weeks after NASDAQ peaked!

As a result, the Nikkei Average got the stuffing knocked out of it in the dotcom collapse. It fell a stunning 15% in the week just after the reconstitution announcement. It cratered from 21,000 to eventually bottom at 7,200. Without the reconstitution, it would have sold out at 10,000.

Having missed the dotcom boom on the upside, the Nikkei fully participated on the downside. Apple shareholders please take note.

Apple?s rise was amply chronicled by a steady series of Trade Alerts in this newsletter.

You can go back to my 2012 prediction that Apple would soar from $485 to $1,000 (click here). On a split adjusted basis we? already reached $931.

I followed that up with ?Apple is Ready to Explode? in October, 2013 (click here), when the post split share price was back at $70.

Indeed, I have issued more Trade Alerts to buy Apple over the seven-year life of this newsletter than any other single name.

It looks like I will be issuing a lot more Apple Trade Alerts in the near future as well.

Guess When the Index Reconstitution Took Place?

The Bipolar Economy

Diary, Newsletter

Corporate earnings are up big! Great!

Buy!

No wait!

The economy is going down the toilet!

Sell! Buy! Sell! Buy! Sell!

Help!

Anyone would be forgiven for thinking that the stock market has become bipolar.

According to the Commerce Department?s Bureau of Economic Analysis, the answer is that corporate profits accounts for only a small part of the economy.

Using the income method of calculating GDP, corporate profits account for only 15% of the reported GDP figure. The remaining components are doing poorly, or are too small to have much of an impact.

Wages and salaries are in a three decade long decline. Interest and investment income is falling, because of the ultra low level of interest rates. Farm incomes are up, but are a tiny proportion of the total. Income from non-farm unincorporated business, mostly small business, is unimpressive.

It gets more complicated than that.

A disproportionate share of corporate profits is being earned overseas. So multinationals with a big foreign presence, like Apple (AAPL), Intel (INTC), Oracle (ORCL), Caterpillar (CAT), and IBM (IBM), have the most rapidly growing profits and pay the least amount in taxes.

They really get to have their cake, and eat it too. Many of their business activities are contributing to foreign GDP?s, like China?s, more than they are here. Those with large domestic businesses, like retailers, earn less, but pay more in tax, as they lack the offshore entities in which to park them.

The message here is to not put all your faith in the headlines, but to look at the numbers behind the numbers. Those who bought in anticipation of good corporate profits last month, got those earnings, and then got slaughtered in the marketplace.

Caveat emptor. Buyer beware.

What?s In the S&P 500?

Has the Market Become Bipolar?

Carl Icahn Is At It Again

Diary, Newsletter

Many ascribe Monday?s 312 point plunge in the Dow Average to an informational webinar posted by legendary corporate raider and hedge fund manager, Carl Icahn.

I have known Carl for 30 years, and I once owned and apartment in his building on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, near Sutton Place (which I later sold for a quick double).

Even then, he was opinionated, cantankerous, and never hesitated to make the bold move. Wall Street hated him.

At 79, he is nothing less than a force of nature. Whenever I see Carl, I say I want to be like him when I grow up.

I just watched the controversial video, entitled ?Danger Ahead ? A Message From Carl Icahn?, which has ruffled more than a few feathers in the establishment. But that has always been Carl?s strong suite.

Here are the high-points:

1) We should end the ?carried interest? treatment of hedge fund profits, which lets billionaire managers get off scot-free, while sticking a big tax bill with the little guy.

2) Foreign profits of US multinationals, some $2.2 trillion, should be brought home, taxed, and put to work.

3) Corporate inversions, whereby American companies reincorporate overseas to beat taxes, should be banned.

4) Corporate share buybacks, which amount to 4.5% of the outstanding float per year, are a short-term fix for company share prices only at the long-term price of a weaker balance sheets.

5) Some $4.5 trillion in borrowing by the Federal Reserve has crowded out the little guy. On this one, I disagree with Carl. With overnight rates at zero and ten year Treasury bonds yielding 2.06%, nobody is getting crowded out from anything.

6) Artificially low interest rates are fueling an unwarranted takeover boom and encouraging risky financial engineering.

7) Junk bonds (HYG), (JNK) are a bubble begging to pop. They are the result of a runaway Wall Street selling machine that saw big firms selling short their own issues to unwary customers.

Carl sums up by saying that while the Fed saved the US economy during 2008-09, they created the problem in the first place with Greenspan?s excessive easing in 2002-03.

He believes that the candidacy of outsider Donald Trump is a natural reaction to peoples? dissatisfaction with Washington and Wall Street.

I have to admit that Carl has brought up some serious points here. I agree with all, except the above-mentioned ?crowding out? issue. Combined, they are a detrimental tax on the long-term economic health of America.

Could this be an attempt by Carl to throw his hat into the political ring? Treasury Secretary in a future Trump administration was mentioned in later media interviews.

But at his age, even for Carl, that would be a reach.

While Icahn has been ringing the alarm bell on the stock market and junk bonds all year, he has been aggressively acquiring major stakes in in the energy and commodities sectors all year, while they are trading at generational lows.

He has zeroed in on two of my own favorite trades, Freeport McMoRan (FCX) and Cheniere Energy (LNG).

Carl is also holding a major position in Apple (AAPL), which he acquired two years ago just after I jumped in at $395. He believes the shares are absurdly cheap.

To watch the 15 minute video in full, please click: http://carlicahn.com.

Good for you, Carl Icahn!

The Solar Road Revisited

Diary, Newsletter

?The Solar Road Revisited?. Somehow this modernized version of Bob Dylan?s epic folk album doesn?t quite ring true when couched in terms of our hyper accelerating 21^st century technology. Perhaps a Millennial bard will improve on this in the future on iTunes, Pandora, and Beats, of course?

Yet, such a futuristic invention has already been created, is raising money through crowdfunding, and even landed a small Federal Highway Administration grant.

We live in an age of exploding technologies. So, when I find some that are especially interesting, offer a potential long term impact on the global economy, or present immediate investment opportunities, I am going to update you in this newsletter.

One common complaint I hear during my road shows is that we are moving into the future so fast, that it is getting increasingly hard to keep up. That is, unless you live within sight of Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOG), Twitter (TWTR), and Facebook (FB) headquarters, which I do. These companies all have venture capital arms, which fund many of these things.

Sandpoint, Idaho based engineers Julie and Scott Brusaw are the founders of Solar Roadways, a tiny engineering company that seeks to convert the American highway system from old fashioned asphalt and concrete to tempered glass and LED?s.

They have raised $2 million through the crowdsourcing website Indiegogo, which saw its amazing videos on the project go viral and attract 15 million views (https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/solar-roadways ).

Caution: conservatives may want to avert their eyes during all of the global warming, anti gasoline, and tree hugging references. But this stuff raises big bucks in California.

What can solar roads do? Obviously, the green hexagonal panels they are made of convert sunlight into electricity, heating roads so they can remain free of ice and snow all year. I could really use that up at Lake Tahoe.

Surplus power can be sold to local utilities to pay for it. Electric cars, like my Tesla Model S-1 (TSLA), can recharge their batteries just by parking on it, as my toothbrush already does in my bathroom.

You can program the LED?s to embed changeable road signs, borders, parking lots, and crosswalks. They can highlight crossing animals (200 deaths a year now in the US), or impending road obstructions.

They can even display layouts for every kind of sport (basketball, tennis, etc). The glass can be cast to give it a better grip than contemporary roads. Highway deaths would plunge, as would insurance costs.

Driving trucks on glass? The material is so strong that it can support the heaviest, or some 62 tons. My question, can handle steel caterpillar tractor treads used in road repair equipment?

Of course, it always comes down to cost with these new technologies, many of which remain pie in the sky forever. Estimates are that these roads cost 50%-300% more than existing ones. Large-scale construction would bring that down through economies of scale via mass production. The design is really quite simple.

The vision is big. It would probably cost over $1 trillion just to pave over the existing 48,000 miles of the interstate highway system. Tens of thousands of blue-collar jobs would be created. It all sounds like a massive public works project would be required, of Rooseveltian, CCC magnitude.

This just gives you a flavor of the incredibly interesting things going on here in the San Francisco Bay area, which I learn about on a daily basis. Check out the site, if only to see the future of start up funding.

You can contribute $5, or just buy a tote bag.

Somehow, It?s Just Not the Same

?

How the Markets Will Play Out This Quarter

Diary, Newsletter, Research

I think I have figured out the course of the global financial markets over the next few months.

We are currently transitioning from an economic data flow from Q1 that was very weak, to the second quarter, which will almost certainly deliver us a robust set of numbers. This is on the heels of a white hot Q1, 2014.

Hot, cold, hot; this is a trader?s dream come true, as it gives us the volatility we need to make a fortune, as we skillfully weave in and out of these gyrations.

That is, if you read the Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader.

This is not a new thing. A weak Q1 has been a recurring event over the last 30 years. The anomaly has been so reliable that not a few traders have been able to earn a living from it. :) Heaven help us if the government ever tries to fix it.

To further complicate matters, some markets see this, while others have yet to open their eyes.

The stock market (SPY), (QQQ), (IWM) agree with my view, probing new all time highs, while companies announce diabolical Q1 earnings (Twitter (TWTR)? Yikes!). So do commodities, like oil (USO) and copper (FCX), whose recent strength suggests we are on the doorstep of a great economic Golden Age.

However, the foreign exchange market (FXE), (FXY) doesn?t see it this way. They can only comprehend the last data point that just crossed the tape.

If it is weak, they assume the Federal Reserve won?t even think about raising interest rates until well into 2016. If it is healthy, they bet the Fed will jack up rates tomorrow.

You might assume this is ridiculous, and you?d be right. However, forex traders live in a world where interest rate differentials are the principal, and to many the only driver of foreign exchange rates.

One market is right, and one is wrong. Did I mention that this is also a license for we nimble traders to print money?

Of course, you can play both side of the fence, as I do. That?s how I was able to coin it with a long position in the euro (a weak economy trade) the same day my long US equity portfolio (a strong economy trade) was going through the roof.

Let me give you another iteration of these scenarios. Inside the dollar correction we are seeing a pronounced sector rotation among US stocks.

Traders are moving out of small caps (IWM) that sheltered then from a strong dollar into large caps (SPY). They are also taking profits in biotech and rolling it into financials (GS), cyber security (PANW) and solar (TAN).

Goldman Sachs (GS) gave us more rocket fuel for the bull case for of American stocks this morning. The sage investment bank, in which my Trade Alert Service currently maintains a profitable long position, says that corporations will return a mind blowing $1 trillion to investors in 2015.

Share buy back from companies should rise by 18%, while dividends should pop by 7%. It is all a continuation of a six-year trend.

Apple (AAPL) certainly kicked off this quarter?s cavalcade of higher payouts on Monday, when it added $50 billion to its own stock repurchase program and jacked up its dividend by 11%.

Markets could get even more interesting after next week, when some 80% of S&P 500 companies will have existed the ?black out? period when they are not allowed by SEC regulations to buy their own stock.

I say ?tally ho,? and ?tally ho? again.

It?s Tally Ho for the Stock Market

Ten Reasons Why Stocks Are Still Going Up

Diary, Newsletter, Research

While driving back from Lake Tahoe last weekend, I received a call from a dear friend who was in a very foul mood. He had bailed on all his equity holdings at the end of last year, fully expecting a market crash in the New Year.

Despite market volatility doubling, multinationals getting crushed by the weak euro and the Federal Reserve now signaling its first interest rate rise in a decade, here we are with the major stock indexes sitting at all time highs.

Why the hell are stocks still going up?

I paused for a moment as a kid driving a souped up Honda weaved into my lane of Interstate 80, cutting me off. Then I gave him my response, which I summarize below:

1) There is nothing else to buy. Complain all you want, but US equities are now one of the world?s highest yielding securities, with a lofty 2% dividend. That compares to one third of European debt offering negative rates and US Treasuries at 1.90%.

2) Oil prices have yet to bottom and the windfall cost savings are only just being felt around the world.

3) While the weak euro is definitely eating into large multinational earnings, we are probably approaching the end of the move. The cure for a weak euro is a weak euro. The worst may be behind for US exporters.

4) What follows a collapse in European economic growth? A European recovery, powered by a weak currency. This is why China has been on fire, which exports more to Europe than anywhere else.

5) What follows a Japanese economic collapse? A recovery there too, as hyper accelerating QE feeds into the main economy. Japanese stocks are now among the worlds cheapest. This is why the Nikkei Average hit a new 15-year high over the weekend, giving me yet another winning Trade Alert.

6) While the next move in interest rates will certainly be up, it is not going to move the needle on corporate P&L?s for a long time. We might see a ?% hike and then done, and that probably won?t happen until 2016. In a deflationary world, there is no room for more. At least, that?s what Janet tells me.

This will make absolutely no difference to the large number of corporates, like Apple (AAPL), that don?t borrow at all.

7) Technology everywhere is accelerating at an immeasurable pace, causing profits to do likewise. You see this in biotech, where blockbuster new drugs are being announced almost weekly.

See the new Alzheimer?s cure announced last week? It involves extracting the cells from the brains of alert 95 year olds, cloning them and then injecting them into early stage Alzheimer?s patients. The success rate has been 70%. That one alone could be worth $5 billion.

8) US companies are still massive buyers of their own stock, over $170 billion worth in 2014. This has created a free put option for investors for the most aggressive companies, like Apple (AAPL), IBM (IBM), Exxon (XOM), Wells Fargo (WFC), and Intel (INTC), the top five repurchasers. They have nothing else to buy either.

They are jacking up dividend payouts at a frenetic pace as well and are expected to return more than $430 billion in payouts this year (see chart below).

9) Oil will bottom in the coming quarter, if it hasn?t done so already. This will make the entire energy sector the ?BUY? of the century, dragging the indexes up as well. Have you noticed that Conoco Phillips (COP), Warren Buffets favorite oil company, now sports a stunning 4.70% dividend?

10) Ditto for the banks, which were dragged down by falling interest for most of 2015. Reverse that trade this year, and you have another major impetus to drive stock indexes higher.

My friend was somewhat set back, dazzled, and non-plussed by my long-term overt bullishness. He asked me if I could think on anything that might trigger a new bear market, or at least a major correction.

I told him to forget anything international. There is no foreign development that could damage the US economy in any meaningful way. No one cares.

On he other hand, I could think of a lot of possible scenarios that could be hugely beneficial for US stocks, like a peace deal with Iran, which would chop oil prices by another half.

The traditional causes of recessions, oil price and interest rate spikes, are nowhere on the horizon. In fact, the prices for these two commodities, energy and money, are headed lower and not higher, another deflationary symptom.

Then something occurred to me. Share prices have been going up for too long and need some kind of rest, weeks or possibly months. At a 17 multiple American stocks are not the bargain they were 6 years ago when they sold for 10X earnings. Those were the only thing I could think of.

But then those are the arguments for shifting money out of the US and into Europe, Japan, and China, which is what the entire world seems to be doing right now.

I have joined them as well, which is why my Trade Alert followers are long the Wisdom Tree Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DXJ) (click here for ?The Bull Case for Japanese Stocks?).

With that, I told my friend I had to hang up, as another kid driving a souped up Shelby Cobra GT 500, obviously stolen, was weaving back an forth in front of me requiring my attention.

Whatever happened to driver?s ed?

Why There is No Bubble in Stocks

Diary, Newsletter, Research

One couldn?t help but notice the outbreak of recollection, reminiscing and schadenfreude that took place yesterday when the NASDAQ briefly tipped over 5,000.

I remember it like it was yesterday. I am still amazed by the frenzy that took place, witnessing the kind of bubble one only sees twice a century. And I was right in the thick of it, living in nearby Silicon Valley.

Business school students were raising $50 million with a one-page business plan. An analyst predicted that Amazon (AMZN) shares would double to $400 in a year. It happened in only four weeks.

All of my attorneys quit, taking up prestige jobs as chief legal counsels at new start ups, taking stock in lieu of pay, dollar bills dancing in front of their eyes. They were replaced by the ?B? team. Other law firms started accepting stock as payment of legal fees.

I knew more than one office secretary who took pay cuts to $15,000 a year in exchange for stock, which they later sold for $2 million.

When I tried to expand my company, I couldn?t find a larger office to rent. San Francisco had run out of office space. So I bought a house for $7 million instead and worked from there. That was no problem, as everyone had $7 million then.

But what I remember most fondly were the parties. The beneficiaries of every IPO sought to celebrate with the biggest party in Bay Area history, each one eclipsing the last. An entire industry of creative party organizers sprung up, seeking to outdo every competitor.

I remember most fondly the Vodka luge carved out of a giant block of ice, where a pretty hostage poured 100 proof super cooled rocket fuel straight down your throat. By midnight, the passed out bodies started piling up on the periphery.

Those were the days!

Which brings us to today, when handwringing is breaking out all over. Investors are afraid that we are just now putting in the double top of the century in NASDAQ, with a very neat 15 years taking place between peaks.
Is it time to sell?

I think not.

Today, we see a completely different world from the one we knew in 2000. Global GDP then was a mere $32 trillion. Today it is 2.5 times higher at $78 trillion. Using this simplistic measure, the GDP adjusted value of NASDAQ should be 12,187.

The high tech index peaked at a price earnings multiple of 100 times earnings. Today it is 30 times. That means the multiple adjusted high for NASDAQ today would be 16,650.

Technology stocks then didn?t pay dividends. Today, look at Apple (AAPL), which pays a 1.50% dividend worth $11.25 billion in annual payouts. This revenue stream provides enormous support under the market, and almost makes Apple shares perform more like bonds than stocks.

Which brings me to a new investment thesis.

What if the stocks that peaked in 2000 are only now just breaking out and starting long bull runs? I am thinking of quality technology names that have completed long, sideways, basing moves. Ebay (EBAY), Broadcom (BRCM), and Cisco (CSCO) leap to the fore.

The possibilities boggle the mind.

I think that in order to get NASDAQ to really get the bit between its teeth, one thing has to happen. Apple has to stop going up.

You really only had to make one stock call in 2014. You had to be overweight Apple. If you did, you were a star. If you didn?t, then you are still probably looking for a new job on Craig?s List.

Managers are behaving as if the past were a prologue, loading the boat with Apple with their eyes firmly fixed on the rear view mirror. That explains the blowout 13% jump in Steve Jobs? creation so far in 2015, some $90 billion in market capitalization.

All you need is for investors to stop buying Apple for 15 minutes and rotate into other big tech names. That was my logic behind my Trade Alert to buy Cisco two weeks ago. If that occurs, it will be off to the races for NASDAQ once again.

Remember that old saw in technical analysis land, ?the longer the base, the bigger the air above it.?

A vodka martini, anyone?

2014 Trade Alert Review

Diary, Free Research, Newsletter

When is the Mad Hedge Fund Trader a genius, and when is he a complete moron?

That is the question readers have to ask themselves whenever their smart phones ping, and a new Trade Alert appears on their screens.

I have to confess that I wonder myself sometimes.

So I thought I would run my 2014 numbers to find out when I was a hero, and when I was a goat.

The good news is that I was a hero most of the time, and a goat only occasionally. Here is the cumulative profit and loss for the 75 Trade Alerts that I closed during calendar 2014, listed by asset class.

Profit by Asset Class

Foreign Exchange 15.12%
Equities 12.52%
Fixed Income 7.28%
Energy 1.4%
Volatility -1.68%

Total 37.64%

Foreign exchange trading was my big winner for 2014, accounting for nearly half of my profits. My most successful trade of the year was in my short position in the Euro (FXE), (EUO).

I piled on a double position at the end of July, just as it became apparent that the beleaguered European currency was about to break out of a multi month sideway move into a pronounced new downtrend.

I then kept rolling the strikes down every month. Those who bought the short Euro 2X ETF (EUO) made even more.

The fundamentals for the Euro were bad and steadily worsening. It helped that I was there for two months during the summer and could clearly see how grotesquely overvalued the currency was. $20 for a cappuccino? Mama mia!

Nothing beats on the ground, first hand research.

Stocks generated another third of my profits last year and also accounted for my largest number of Trade Alerts.

I correctly identified technology and biotech as the lead sectors for the year, weaving in and out of Apple (AAPL) and Gilead Sciences (GILD) on many occasions. I also nailed the recovery of the US auto industry (GM), (F).

I safely stayed away from the energy sector until the very end of the year, when oil hit the $50 handle. I also prudently avoided commodities like the plague.

Unfortunately, I was wrong on the bond market for the entire year. That didn?t stop me from making money on the short side on price spikes, with fixed income chipping a healthy 7.28% into the kitty.

It was only at the end of the year, when the prices accelerated their northward trend that they started to cost me money. My saving grace was that I kept positions small throughout, doubling up on a single occasion and then coming right back out.

My one trade in the energy sector for the year was on the short side, in natural gas (UNG), selling the simple molecule at the $5.50 level. With gas now plumbing the depths at $2.90, I should have followed up with more Trade Alerts. But hey, a 1.4% gain is better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick.

In which asset class was I wrong every single time? Both of the volatility (VIX) trades I did in 2014 lost money, for a total of -1.68%. I got caught in one of many downdrafts that saw volatility hugging the floor for most of the year, giving it to me in the shorts with the (VXX).

All in all, it was a pretty good year.

What was my best trade of 2014? I made 2.75% with a short position in the S&P 500 in July, during one of the market?s periodic 5% corrections.

And my worst trade of 2014? I got hit with a 6.63% speeding ticket with a long position in the same index. But I lived to fight another day.

After a rocky start, 2015 promises to be another great year. That is, provided you ignore my advice on volatility.

Here is a complete list of every trade I closed last year, sorted by asset class, from best to worse.

Date	Position	Asset Class	Long/short	?	?	?	?	?	?
7/25/14	(SPY) 8/$202.50 - $202.50 put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	2.75%
10/16/14	(GILD) 11/$80-$85 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	2.57%
5/19/14	(TLT) 7/$116-$119 put spread	fixed income	long	?	?	?	?	?	2.48%
4/4/14	(IWM) 8/$113 puts	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	2.38%
7/10/14	(AAPL) 8/$85-$90 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	2.30%
2/3/14	(TLT) 6/$106 puts	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	2.27%
9/19/14	(IWM) 11/$117-$120 put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	2.26%
10/7/14	(FXE) 11/$127-$129 put spread	foreign exchange	long	?	?	?	?	?	2.22%
9/26/14	(IWM) 11/$116-$119 put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	2.21%
4/17/14	(TLT) 5/$114-$117 put spread	fixed income	long	?	?	?	?	?	2.10%
8/7/14	(FXE) 9/$133-$135 put spread	foreign exchange	long	?	?	?	?	?	2.07%
10/2/14	(BAC) 11/$15-$16 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	2.04%
4/9/14	(SPY) 5/$191-$194 put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	2.02%
10/15/14	(DAL) 11/$25-$27 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.89%
9/25/14	(FXE) 11/$128-$130 put spread	foreign exchange	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.86%
6/6/14	(JPM) 7/$52.50-$55.00 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.81%
4/4/14	(SPY) 5/$193-$196 put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.81%
3/14/14	(TLT) 4/$111-$114 put spread	fixed income	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.68%
10/17/14	(AAPL) 11/$87.50-$92.50 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.56%
10/15/14	(SPY) 11/$168-$173 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.51%
7/3/14	(FXE) 8/$138 put spread	foreign exchange	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.51%
10/9/14	(FXE) 11/$128-$130 put spread	foreign exchange	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.48%
9/19/14	(FXE) 10/$128-$130 put spread	foreign exchange	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.45%
10/22/14	(SPY) 11/$179-$183 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.44%
5/29/14	(TLT) 7/$118-$121 put spread	fixed income	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.44%
2/24/14	(UNG) 7/$26 puts	energy	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.40%
2/24/14	(BAC) 3/$15-$16 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.39%
6/23/14	(SPY) 7/$202 put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.37%
9/29/14	(SPY) 10/$202-$205 Put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.29%
5/20/14	(AAPL) 7/$540 $570 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.22%
9/26/14	(SPY) 10/$202-$205 Put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.22%
5/22/14	(GOOGL) 7/$480-$520 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.16%
5/19/14	(FXY) 7/$98-$101 put spread	foreign exchange	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.14%
1/15/14	(T) 2/$35-$37 put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.08%
3/3/14	(TLT) 3/$111-$114 put spread	fixed income	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.07%
1/28/14	(AAPL) 2/$460-$490 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.06%
4/24/14	(SPY) 5/$192-$195 put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.05%
6/6/14	(CAT) 7/$97.50-$100 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	1.04%
7/23/14	(FXE) 8/$134-$136 put spread	foreign exchange	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.99%
8/18/14	(FXE) 9/$133-$135 put spread	foreign exchange	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.94%
11/4/14	(BAC) 12/$15-$16 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.88%
4/9/14	(SPY) 6/$193-$196 put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.88%
7/25/14	(SPY) 8/$202.50 -205 put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.88%
6/6/14	(MSFT) 7/$38-$40 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.87%
10/23/14	(FXY) 11/$92-$95 puts spread	foreign exchange	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.86%
7/23/14	(TLT) 8/$117-$120 put spread	fixed income	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.81%
3/5/14	(DAL) 4/$30-$32 Call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.76%
4/10/14	(VXX) long volatility ETN	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.76%
1/30/14	(UNG) 7/$23 puts	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.66%
4/1/14	(FXY) 5/$96-$99 put spread	foreign currency	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.60%
1/15/14	(TLT) 2/$108-$111 put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.47%
3/6/14	(EBAY) 4/$52.50- $55 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.24%
10/14/14	(TBT) short Treasury Bond ETF	fixed income	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.22%
3/28/14	(VXX) long volatility ETN	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.20%
7/17/14	(TBT) short Treasury Bond ETF	fixed income	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.08%
3/26/14	(VXX) long volatility ETN	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	0.06%
7/8/14	(TLT) 8/$115-$118 put spread	fixed income	long	?	?	?	?	?	-0.18%
4/28/14	(SPY) 5/$189-$192 put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	-0.45%
3/5/14	(GE) 4/$24-$25 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	-0.73%
4/28/14	(VXX) long volatility ETN	volatility	long	?	?	?	?	?	-0.81%
4/24/14	(TLT) 5/$113-$116 put spread	fixed income	long	?	?	?	?	?	-0.87%
4/28/14	(VXX) long volatility ETN	volatility	long	?	?	?	?	?	-0.87%
6/6/14	(IBM) 7/$180-$185 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	-1.27%
9/30/14	(SPY) 11/$185-$190 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	-1.51%
10/9/14	(TLT) 11/$122-$125 put spread	fixed income	long	?	?	?	?	?	-1.55%
9/24/14	(TSLA) 11/$200 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	-1.62%
2/27/14	(SPY) 3/$189-$192 put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	-1.67%
3/6/14	(BAC) 4/$16 calls	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	-2.01%
10/14/14	(SPY) 10/$180-$184 call spread	equities	short	?	?	?	?	?	-2.13%
11/14/14	(BABA) 12/$100-$105 call spread	equities	short	?	?	?	?	?	-2.38%
10/20/14	(SPY) 11/$197-$202 call spread	equities	short	?	?	?	?	?	-2.72%
7/3/14	(GM) 8/$33-$35 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	-2.91%
3/7/14	(GM) 4/$34-$36 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	-2.96%
11/25/14	(SCTY) 12/47.50-$52.50 call spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	-3.63%
10/20/14	(SPY) 11/$197-$202 call spread	equities	short	?	?	?	?	?	-4.22%
4/14/14	(SPY) 5/$188-$191 put spread	equities	long	?	?	?	?	?	-6.63%

What a Year!

The Bottom Building Process Has Begun

Diary, Newsletter, Research

I have an arrangement with several large hedge funds where they pay me a small fortune every month for the privilege of calling me one day a year.

Wednesday was that day.

It was a day when the $20 billion hedge fund waited on hold while I got off the phone with the $100 billion hedge fund. And that?s not including urgent calls from the White House, the office of the Joint Chiefs, and the Federal Reserve.

Of course, no one needs to tell these guys how to chew gum. They were interested to know if they were missing anything.

The advice I gave them was very short and simple: ?Keep your eye on the economic data, and ignore everything else.?

You can palpably feel the tension when enduring crisis like these. The Internet noticeably slows down. Transatlantic and Transpacific phone lines get clogged up. Traffic on our website, www.madhedgefundtrader.com, rises tenfold.

So do plaintive emails from followers, everyone of which I attempt to answer quickly. To save time, I will give a generic answer to all of you in advance: ?No, it is not time to stop out of your ProShares Ultra Short 20+ Treasury Bond ETF (TBT) position at the $46 handle.? We are at a multiyear peak in bonds, and this is absolutely not the place to puke out. That?s why I always keep my positions small.

You have to allow room for markets to breathe and still be able to hang on when it goes against you. It is also nice to have the dry powder to double up.

I know some of you are suffering from sleepless nights, so I?ll make it easy for you. We have hit bottom for the year. This is the best time in three years to buy stocks, just in case you forgot to load up at any time since 2011. Ditto for bonds on the sell side.

Earnings started coming out last week, and many companies have been delivering blockbuster reports, as I expected. Over all, I think we can expect total S&P 500 earnings to rise by $11.

This means that, given the market?s recent 10% plunge, stocks are now selling at 12.5 X 2015 earnings. That is a rare bargain. It is a chance to buy shares at 2011 valuations. Don?t blink and miss it.

The big driver hasn?t been the Ebola virus, the risk of which has been wildly exaggerated by the media, but the collapse of the price of oil.

I think we got very close to a bottom of the entire move this morning when we tickled $80. I take North Dakota fracking pioneer John Hamm?s view: If this isn?t the bottom, it is close, and wherever the bottom, we will race right back up to $100 sometime next year on China?s insatiable demand.

That means you buy stocks right now.

For a fuller explanation of the fundamentally bullish argument for the stock market, please click here ?10 Reasons Why the Bull Market is Still Alive?.

Now Is the Time to Have a Gunslinger Working on Your Behalf

How to Execute a Vertical Bull Call Spread

Diary, Newsletter, Research

For those readers looking to improve their trading results and create the unfair advantage they deserve, I have just posted a new training video on How to Execute a Vertical Bull Call Spread.

This is a pair of positions in the options market that will be profitable when the underlying security goes up, sideways, or down small in price over a defined period of time. It is the perfect position to have on board during markets that have declining or low volatility, much like we have experienced over the past year.

I have strapped on quite a few of these across many asset classes this year, and they are a major reason why I am up 40%.

To understand this trade, I have used the recent example of Apple, which I executed on July 10, 2014. I felt very strongly that Apple shares would rally into the release of their new iPhone 6 on September 9, 2014.

So followers of my Trade Alert service received text messages and emails to add the following position:

Buy the Apple (AAPL) August, 2014 $85-$90 in-the-money bull call spread at $4.00 or best

To accomplish this, they had to execute the following trades:

Buy 25 August, 2014 (AAPL) $85 calls at????..?$9.60

Sell short 25 August, 2014 (AAPL) $90 calls at??..$5.60
Net Cost:????????????????................$4.00

This gets traders into the position at $4.00, which cost them $10,000 ($4.00 per option X 100 shares per option X 25 contracts).

The vertical part of the description of this trade refers to the fact that both options have the same underlying security (AAPL), the same expiration date (August 15, 2015) and only different strike prices ($85 and $90).

The breakeven point can be calculated as follows:

$85.00 Lower strike price
? $4.00 Price paid for the vertical call spread
$89.00 Break even Apple share price

The great thing about these positions is that your risk is defined. You can?t lose anymore than the $10,000 you put up.

If Apple goes bankrupt, we get a flash crash, or suffer another 9/11 type event, you will never get a margin call from your broker in the middle of the night asking for more money. This is why hedge funds like them so much.

As long as Apple traded at or above $89 on the August 14 expiration date, you will make a profit on this trade.

As it turns out, my read on Apple shares proved dead on, and the shares closed at $97.98 on expiration day, or a healthy $8.98 above my breakeven point.

The total profit on the trade came to:

($1.00 X 100 X 25) = $2,500

This means that the position earned a 25% profit in little more than a month. Now you know why I like Vertical Bull Call Spreads so much.

Occasionally, these things don?t work. As hard as it may be to believe, I am not infallible.

So if I?m wrong and I tell you to buy a vertical bull call spread, and the shares fall not a little, but a lot, you will lose money. On those rare cases when that happens, I?ll shoot out a Trade Alert to you with stop-loss instructions before the damage gets out of control.

To watch the video edition of How to Execute a Vertical Bull Call Spread, complete with more detailed instructions on how to execute the position with your online platform, please click here.

Tag Archive for: (AAPL)

What?s In the S&P 500?