(BAC) Archives

Holder Retirement Could Send Bank of America Flying

Watching the market melt down today, I have been hurriedly compiling a shopping list of stocks to buy, and writing the Trade Alerts in advance for readers to execute.

If I am right about interest rates remaining flat or rising for the rest of the year, then financials have to be at the absolute top of such a list.

Bank of America (BAC) certainly was the chief whipping boy of the financial crisis. Since 2008, it has paid out more than $50 billion in fines and lawsuit settlements for every transgression under the sun.

After getting a bail out from the US Treasury, it was forced to cut its dividend payment to a token one cent. Do any Google search on the company and you are inundated with a flood of bad news.

All that is now ancient history. The entire banking industry is now moving into the sweet spot in the economic cycle. This is because rising interest rates mean that they will be able to charge more for loans, while their cost of funds (deposits and equity) remains low. These rising spreads fall straight to the bottom line.

Now with the bank?s Torturer-in-Chief, US Attorney General Eric Holder, announcing his retirement, the way is clear for better days ahead.

With the 30-year bull market in bonds now at an end, substantially higher rates in the near future are now included in virtually every economic forecast out there. Since the beginning of 2014 the ten-year Treasury yield has collapsed from 3.05% to as low as 2.32% at he end of August, pummeling bank shares.

What happens next? They go from 2.32% back up to 3.05%, possibly by yearend, then a lot more. Bank shares will ride on the back of this bull.

The jungle telegraph is now ringing with the prospect of a dividend hike by the company, currently at a lowly four cents. We may get the good news as soon as the next reporting period on October 14. The implications of such a move are broad.

If it pulls this off, it is only because of renewed confidence by the markets in the improved financial condition of the company. After several capital raises and the liquidation of the wreckage of the 2008 crash, US banks are now the healthiest in history, with balance sheets of bedrock stability.

Ahem, they are also too big to fail, again.

To get the dividend yield on the shares up to industry standard of 2.5%, the company really needs to raise its dividend to 42 cents. It certainly has the cash flow to do this. In 2013, (BAC) reported net income of $11.4 billion, more than four times to amount needed to cover such a payout.

Needless to say, this is all great news for the share price. The prospective return of increasing amounts of capital to shareholders should suck in new and wider classes of shareholders. It won?t be just about hedge fund punters anymore. Respectable, large and long term holding institutions will be in there as well.

Take a look at the charts below, and it is clear that such a move is underway. (BAC) broke out from the end of a classic triangle formation, which traditionally resolves itself to the upside. New post crash highs beckon.

You can find more dry powder in the chart for the Financials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF), which clearly rejected a complete breakdown at long-term trend support in early February.

Finally, take a gander at the chart for the S&P 500. New life from the financials will be the adrenaline shot this market needs to break it out of its current low volume sideways consolidation, taking it to new highs as well.

Finally, for those who are concerned that the bull market was killed off by last week?s massive Alibaba IPO (BABA), take a look at he chart below provided by my friends at Business Insider. Certainly, the collapse of the iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has put the fear of God into traders.

The chart tracks long-lived bull markets in terms of their price earnings multiples. It shows that we have only reached half the length of the great 1987-2000 bull market. The implication is that this bull could live another five or more years.

This bull is not dead, it is just resting.

So far, the S&P 500 has declined by a feeble 2.8% off the $202 top. If we break the 50-day moving average here, we could make it down to the 200-day moving average at $1,880, a more substantial 7% pullback. Take that as a gift, and load the boat for the year-end rally.

I?ll send out the Trade Alert to buy (BAC) when I think the timing is ripe.

(XLF) Weekly

(XLF) Daily

Time to Visit the ATM Again

The Bull is Not Dead, It is Resting

The Case for Buying Financials

Newsletter, Research

Regular readers of this letter are probably weary of me harping away about the financials as a great place to put your money for the rest of 2014.

Never mind that these names have all jumped 10% in the past month. But this is not an ?I told you so? story. This is more of a ?But wait, there?s more,? story.

The basis for my call is quite simple. I believe that bond prices are peaking, and yields bottoming. As mining the yield curve is a major source of bank profits, borrowing short term and lending long term, a rise in interest rates falls straight to the bottom line. Thus, buying banks is an indirect way of selling short the bond market.

However, there are many more reasons to overweight this long neglected sector. In a market that has gone virtually straight up for the past three years, many large institutions are going to be forced to roll money out of leaders, like my favored technology, energy and health care, into laggards, such as the financials.

Expect this trend to accelerate as we head into yearend institutional book closing, which start as early as October 30.

Look at other important drivers of bank profits, and you?ll find them at multi decade lows.

Trading and investment banking volumes are off 30%-40% from mean historic levels. We options traders already know this all too well, as turnover has cratered and spreads widened due to investor lack of interest.

This is especially true of put options, which are now being given away virtually for free. Volatility that seems to permanently live at the $12 handle is another such indicator of this disinterest.

This will not last. If my ?Golden Age? scenario plays out in the 2020?s (click here for ?Get Ready for the Coming Golden Age?), trading and investment banking volumes will not only double to return to the norms, they will skyrocket tenfold from today?s tedious, moribund levels.

Indeed, I have recently discovered an entire subculture of financial oriented private equity firms currently amassing portfolios that are betting on precisely such an outcome. Think of big, smart, long-term money. The big bets on the coming decade are being made now.

There is another ripple in the case for banks. After passage of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, otherwise known as ?Dodd Frank?, banks became target numero uno of the federal government. The public?s demand for accountability for the 2008-09 crash knew no bounds.

As a result, the fines and settlements with the big banks, most of which were rescued from bankruptcy by the government, now well exceed $100 billion. Four years into the enforcement onslaught, the Feds are running out of scandals to prosecute. There is nothing left for the banks to plead guilty to.

This means that a major portion of the banks? costs are about to disappear, not only new massive fines, but hundreds of millions of dollars in legal fees and diverted management time as well. More money drops to the bottom line.

Dramatically rising income? Substantially falling costs? Sounds like ?Ka-ching? to me, and a ?BUY? for the bank stocks.

The bottom line is that bank stock could double from here in coming years. It is not hard to pick names. Bank of America (BAC) took the big hit on fines and settlements, and therefore should enjoy the largest bounce.

So should Citigroup (C), which came the closest to vaporizing. And for good measure, I?ll throw in American Express (AXP) as a play on the burgeoning credit card spending by the growing class of well to do.

Barney Frank Had a Few Things to Say

The Market Leadership Change Has Begun

Newsletter

Owners of technology (XLK) and health care stocks (XLV) have certainly had a great year.

Except for the round of profit taking that did a quick hit and run in January, these two groups have been moving from strength to strength, punching through to multiyear highs.

That is, until last week.

Starting with the Ukraine induced plunge a week ago, these two leadership groups have started moving in a rather arthritic fashion, substantially underperforming the S&P 500 (SPY). It is all unfamiliar territory for these golden boys.

You also see this in the broader indexes, with NASDAQ starting to trail the main market for the first time in ages. This is why Mad Day Trader Jim Parker shot out Alerts to buy protective puts in the (QQQ) with a one week view.

Is the bull market over? Should you sell everything and immediately go into cash? Is it time to go hide under your bed?

I don?t think so.

All we are seeing is a long awaited leadership change in the market. Tech and health care will throttle back from their torrid pace. It doesn?t mean that these sectors are now to be given up for dead. You should wallpaper your spare bathroom with high tech share certificates (as I once did with my Japanese equity warrants after their crash). They just need a rest. This is why I skipped Apple (AAPL) in my latest round of ?RISK ON? Trade Alerts.

In the meantime, financial stocks (XLF) have moved to the fore to grab the baton after a two-month rest of their own. This is why I sent you Trade Alerts last week to buy Bank of America (BAC), Goldman Sachs (GS), and General Motors (GM).

A shift like this makes all the sense in the world. Bonds (TLT) were great performers in 2014 until a week ago, when they double topped on the charts at $109. That was the logic behind sending you my Trade Alert to sell short bonds.

When bonds fall, interest rates rise, some 20 basis points on the ten year Treasury bond in a mere five days. Who does well when rates rise? Banks, which can now charge more for their loans while the cost of funds, the deposit rates you earn, are still close to zero. That widens bank profit margins, increasing profits. The technical term for this, which you will hear about on TV, is the ?steepening of the yield curve.? Bottom line: buy bank stocks.

They could rise a lot. If Treasury yields back all the way up to 3.05% and the (TLT) revisits its $101 low, the bank shares could go on a real tear. Jim Parker?s medium term target for (BAC) is $23, up a robust 30% from here.

I already have written up a Trade Alert to pick up another bank, JP Morgan (JPM). But I will sit on it until I can catch a dip in the share price, even a piddling one.

And what about the autos? The message shouted out as loud and clear by the red-hot February nonfarm payroll print of 175,000 is that the economy is stronger than anyone thinks. This is an out there view, which I have been arguing vociferously since the summer.

The ferocious winter will no doubt cost retailers some clothing sales. No one is looking to buy a new winter coat in March. Year on year, Chicago has gone from six inches to an astounding seven feet of snow, and I?m told that everyone there is in an unspeakably foul mood, throwing empty bear cans at the TV set when the weather man appears.

This is not so for the auto industry. If buyers couldn?t find their local dealers under the snow, they will return during fairer climes with a check to take advantage of record low interest rates. At the end of the day, buying a car on dealer credit, or a lease, is a nice way to indirectly short the bond market, which we all know, is now in a new 30-year bear market.

Despite the endless blizzards that kept much of the east buried this year, the auto sales figures have held up surprisingly well. The industry is now running at a 15.7 million unit per year annualized rate, up from the 9 million unit trough seen in 2009.

It all sets up a nice upside surprise in carmaker profits after the spring thaw. You want to go out and purchase the entire sector, including General Motors (GM), Ford (F), and all of the subsidiary parts suppliers.

But Which One is On Sale?

Dividend Hike Could Send Bank of America Flying

Newsletter

Bank of America (BAC) certainly was the chief whipping boy of the financial crisis. Since 2008, it has paid out more than $50 billion in fines and lawsuit settlements for every transgression under the sun.

After getting a bail out from the US Treasury, it was forced to cut its dividend payment to a token one cent. Do any Google search on the company and you are inundated with a flood of bad news.

All that is now ancient history. The entire banking industry is now moving into the sweet spot in the economic cycle. This is because rising interest rates mean that they will be able to charge more for leans, while their cost of funds (deposits and equity) remains low. This rising spread falls straight to the bottom line.

With the 30 year bull market in bonds now at an end, substantially higher rates in the near future are now included in virtually every economic forecast out there. Since the beginning of 2014 the ten-year Treasury yield has rocketed from 3.05% to as high as 2.58%, pummeling bank shares.

What happens next? They go from 2.58% back up to 3.05%, then a lot more. Bank shares will ride on the back of this bull.

The jungle telegraph is now ringing with the prospect of a dividend hike by the company, from a penny to five cents. The implications of such a move are broad.

For a start, the company would have to get the permission of the Federal Reserve to do so. If it pulls this off, it is only because of renewed confidence by the government in the improved financial condition of the country. After several capital raises and the liquidation of the wreckage of the 2008 crash, US banks are now the healthiest in history, with balance sheets of bedrock stability.

If (BAC) can get this first dividend hike through, more will follow. To get the dividend yield on the shares up to industry standard of 2.5%, the company really needs to raise its dividend to 40 cents. If certainly has the cash flow to do this. In 2013, (BAC) reported net income of $11.4 billion, more than four times to amount needed to cover such a payout.

Needless to say, this is all great news for the share price. The prospective return of increasing amounts of capital to shareholders should suck in new and wider classes of shareholders. It won?t be just about hedge fund punters anymore.

Take a look at the charts below, and it is clear that such a move is setting up. (BAC) is reaching the end of a classic triangle formation, which traditionally resolves itself to the upside. You can find more dry powder in the chart for the Financials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF), which clearly rejected a complete breakdown at long term trend support in early February.

Finally, take a gander at the chart for the S&P 500. New life from the financials will be the adrenaline shot this market needs to break it out of its current low volume sideways consolidation, taking it to new highs.

This is why I popped out the trade alert to buy the (BAC) March $15-$16 call spread on Monday. Thanks to the denial of service attack on our email provider, AWeber Communications, it has taken me until now to get this update out.

It is all another reason to sign up for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader?s text alert service, which readers around the world received within an incredible ten seconds of the original issue of the Trade Alert. I saw it work its magic when I was in Australia, and it is a sight to behold.

Where?s This Market Bottom?

Newsletter

After yesterday?s 217 point swoon, the S&P 500 (SPX) has fallen 4.3% from its late May peak. It looks like the ?Sell in May? crowd is having the last laugh after all, of which I was one.

Is this a modest 5% correction in a continuing bull market? Or is it the beginning of a Harry Dent style crash to (SPX) 300 (click here for the interview on Hedge Fund Radio)? Let?s go to the videotape.

This was one of the most overbought stock markets in my career. I have to think back to the top of the dotcom boom in 2000 and the pinnacle of the Tokyo bubble in 1989 to recall similar levels of ebullience. In fact, two weeks ago we were at a real risk of a major melt up if we didn?t encounter some sort of pullback. So the modest selling we have seen so far has been welcome, even by the bulls.

There is still a reasonable chance the final decline will be nothing more than a pit stop on the way to new highs. Institutional weightings in equities are at a lowly 31%, compared to 50% 20 years ago. It seems that everyone in the world is overweight bonds (see yesterday?s piece on ?Welcome to the Sack of Rome?).

In recent weeks, the S&P 500 yield ratio has fallen behind that of the 10 year Treasury bond, at 2.10%, but only just. With a price/earnings multiple of 16, we are bang in the middle of a long time historic range of 10-22. Zero overnight interest rates argue that we should be at the top end of that range. The argument that the ?Buy the Dip? crowd is still lurking under the market is real, just a little further than the recent dips allowed.

So how much lower do we have to go? After the close, I enjoyed an in depth discussion with my old friend, Jim Parker, of Mad Day Trader fame about the possible permutations. The following is an itinerary of what your summer trading might look like, expressed in (SPX) terms:

6.2% - 1,605 was the Wednesday low, the 50 day moving average, and the downside of the most recent upward sloping channel on the chart below. This trifecta of support is many traders? first stop for a bounce.

5.4% - 1,590 is the first major downside Fibonacci level. We could see this as soon as the May nonfarm report payroll is announced on Friday.

6.0% - 1,580 is the old 13-year high. Markets always love to retrace to old breakout levels.

6.5% - 1,570 represents a give back of one third of the November-May 330 point rally.

8.3% - 1,540 is the double bottom off the April low.

11.1% - 1,493 is the 200-day moving average. This is the worst-case scenario. I doubt we?ll get there, unless the fundamentals change, which they always do.

Jim gave me a couple more cogent insights. The average big swing move is 100-110 points. The last 100-point move sprung off of the March nonfarm payroll report, which came out on April 5. Big swings also often start and finish around an options expiration, the next one of those is coming on June 21. So for the short term, 1580-1590 is looking good.

To confuse you even further, contemplate the concept that I refer to as the ?Lead Contract.? There is always a lead contract around, one on which all traders maintain a laser like focus, which leads every other financial product out there. It says ?Jump,? and we ask ?How High?? It is also always changing.

Right now, the Nikkei average (DXJ) is the lead contract. The Japanese yen ETF (FXY) is the close inverse. Every flight from risk during the past two weeks has been preceded by a falling Nikkei and a rising yen.
If you want to get a preview of each day?s US trading, stay up the night before and watch the action in Tokyo, as I often do.

You might even learn a word or two of Japanese, which will come in handy when ordering in the better New York sushi shops.

Looking for More Market Insights

Here Comes the Rolling Top

Newsletter

The S&P 500 is now at 1,564, and most strategist forecasts for the end of 2013 hover around 1,550-1,600, plus or minus some spare change. So the next nine months are going to be incredibly boring. Or they won?t.

Even in a bull market, one expects to see pullbacks of at least one third of the recent gain. Apply that logic towards the 224 points the (SPX) has tacked on since the November low, and that adds up to a 74 point, or a 4.7% correction down to 1,490.

There is massive liquidity in the system, many individuals and institutions are underweight, and interest rates are still at incredibly low levels. It also appears that every foreign financial disaster results in more money getting sent to the US for safety.

Usually, the (SPX) never rises more than 9% above the 200 day moving average without hitting a correction. This year is different. I can?t remember the last time the index spent this much time at that level without a pullback.

We are therefore likely to see a rolling type market top that unfolds over the next several months. That is in contrast to a spike top, which you can spot on a chart without your glasses from 20 feet away. These tops can be devilishly difficult to trade, with the limits defined more by time than price.

If you want to see what such a rolling top looks like, take a peak at the chart for my old friend, Dr. Copper, that great prognosticator of future economic activity. He put in such a rolling top during the first eight months of 2011, and has been trying to recover ever since, to no avail.

This no doubt reflects the slowing economy and the building copper inventories in China, where the red metal is widely used as a monetary instrument. China, in effect, is on a copper standard. It is rare to see the (SPX) going up and copper dropping like, well, a bar of copper.

While the broader indexes are likely to deliver a rolling top, that is not the case with individual sectors and stocks. That means you can use these individual spikes to assist in your timing of the overall market. You need to watch the market leaders like a hawk, such as the financials and the transports. If Bank of America (BAC) and United Continental Group (UAL), suddenly crash and burn, you can bet the rest of the market won?t be far behind. This is one of the reasons why I have these two names in my model-trading portfolio, on which you should maintain your laser focus.

The consumer discretionary and retail sectors are two additional pathfinder sectors that are the most economically sensitive in the market, which also make great canaries in the coalmine. As long as consumers are packing MacDonald?s (MCD), Home Depot (HD), and Target (TGT), or burning up their Comcast (CMCSA) broadband connections buying stuff from Amazon (AMZN), you won?t see appreciable market weakness. Earnings disappointments at these businesses, which could start in three weeks, are another great precursor of market trouble.

Finally, there is another class of stocks that may lead the charge on the downside, and that is small caps. Look at the chart below for the ETF for the Russell 2000 (IWM). Small companies are always hardest hit in any slowdown because they are more highly leveraged and have less access to external financing, like bank loans and equity floatations. I made a bundle last year shorting the (IWM) into the ?Sell in May? market meltdown, and plan to do so again this year.

Of course, timing is everything, and I?ll tell you what worries me the most. The overdependence of this bull market on the largess of the Federal Reserve cannot be underestimated. Any hint that quantitative easing is about to join the dustbin of history will take the market with it.

The conventional wisdom is that our esteemed central bank won?t embark on this path until year-end. What if it surprises us with a June tightening? The bull market would die of an instant heart attack. What would trigger this? A blowout monthly nonfarm payroll number approaching 300,000, which would quickly take the headline unemployment rate close to the Fed?s publicly announced 6.5% target. With the economy perhaps growing at a 3% rate this quarter, such a development might be only a handful of Friday?s away.

So how is the genius, aggressive hedge fund trader going to deal with these opaque markets? Bet that the market is going to stay in a broad range for a few more months. We aren?t going to the moon, nor are we going to crash. We are more likely to die of ice than fire. That?s what the volatility markets (VIX) are telling us.

There are several ways to play this kind of market. If you have a plain vanilla stock portfolio, you should be executing ?buy writes? against your existing holdings to take in extra premium income. With the bull move five months old, call options are trading at historically rich levels. This low risk, high return strategy involves selling short call options against existing stock positions. If your stock gets called away, you just say ?thank you very much? and buy it back on the way down.

For the more aggressive, you can add naked short sales of deep out of the money calls one month out. You don?t get rich with a strategy like this, but you earn a living.

You might also buy some deep out-of-the-money index puts for pennies. They are now trading near the cheapest prices in history. One market hiccup, and these things double very quickly.

Hmmm. Doesn?t Look Like Ben Bernanke

The Bull Case for Bank of America

Newsletter

I?ll give you the quick and dirty argument behind buying Bank of America. For the past four years, the main argument for avoiding this stock like the plague was the hidden book of bad home loans it was hiding on its back bookshelf, thought to be in the tens of billions of dollars. This is why the shares spent most of the last half decade trading at a pitiful 50% of its book value. Nobody believed what management was representing as its true value.

Throw a sustainable recovery in the real estate market into the mix, and that excuse goes out the window. Rising property values means better quality collateral for the bank and more credible asset value representations. This will encourage equity investors to pay up to book value, 60% higher than price to book of 63%, and possibly more. That gets you at least to $20/share right there.

Do any search on (BAC), and a vast outpouring of contentions litigation, regulatory transgressions, and fines will pour out. Wherever there has been trouble in the financial system for the past decade, Bank of America was there, and up to its neck. The key point is that these are all in the past, settled, and accounted for in the future earnings stream.

Some of the acquisitions that (BAC) made during the crash were horrendous in their timing. It never missed an opportunity to overpay. The $2 billion Countrywide Financial acquisition stands out for its stupidity, which ate up masses of management time. Merrill Lynch at $50 billion? You must be joking. At that price, I have a pretty orange bridge here in San Francisco I?d like to sell them, as well. This was when a charitable valuation for the old raging bull would have been zero. Add 130% to the Dow average and it is a different story. The booming stock market has enabled Merrill?s profits to surge, and (BAC) could probably flip it here for a tidy profit.

After winding down positions in financials for five years, many long-term institutional investors are now running generational lows in this unloved sector. Return to market weightings could take years. Sure, we have already covered some serious ground with (BAC), from $5 to $12.75. I think the stock could make it up to $20 this year, and $30 eventually. Trend reversals like this go on for years. Looks like Warren Buffet got the bottom at $5, again!

Finally, (BAC), along with the entire banking industry, is perfectly positioned to profit from rising interest rates. Steep yield curves are where banks traditionally make their bread and butter, through borrowing short and lending long. The collapse of the Treasury bond market (TLT) may not be imminent, but it is coming. Think of (BAC) as an undated put on Treasury market.

This particular option spread, the $11-$12 in April is attractive because the upper strike matches the old upside breakout level on the charts. This should provide ample support during the inevitable correction. The April expiration is only 22 trading days away.

Why I?m Covering My Bank Short

Diary

I am going to use the weakness in Bank of America shares today to cover my short position through selling my existing position in the (BAC) May, 2012 $7 puts at $0.24 cents or best. There is such minimal volatility in the market these days that when a little bit comes along, you have to grab it with both hands.

The poor performance of these puts illustrates well the general malaise of the market. Despite catching a five cent drop in the share price, the value of these April puts fell from 40 cents to 24 cents. This is what happens when option time decay is added in with falling market volatility. This is why many option strategies are failing to work now.

When I recognized that this could become a prolonged problem, I responded with a rash of short volatility positions which have proved highly profitable. These include running deep in the money bull call spreads in Microsoft (MSFT) and Apple (AAPL), and naked sales of deep out of the money Apple calls.

I could have sold the (BAC) puts twice over the last 19 days for a profit as high as 30%. I held on both times hoping that the long overdue downward momentum would develop. That never materialized. The shares only made it down to $7.66, well short of my $7 target. The lesson here is that in these market conditions you have to keep your time frames as short as possible. Taking the money and running is the winning approach.

There are other reasons to punt on this position. The February non-farm payroll that comes out this Friday is expected to be good, possibly over 200,000. That could trigger another rally in (BAC) shares. Weekly jobless claims are at new lows for this cycle.

New housing sales are also showing a glimmer of life. Any good news on real estate is also positive for banks, no matter how ephemeral it might be, because it suggests that their bad loan portfolios may recover a bit. So it is better to sit on the sidelines on this one and take advantage of better entry points that may come along higher up.

The Looking Glass Market

Diary

If you feel like this market has sucked you down a rabbit hole, you have plenty of company.

I have never seen such a profusion of contrary cross market indicators. Traders are running up shares prices while companies are cutting earnings forecasts. Economists are raising GDP forecasts as rising energy prices are taking them the opposite direction. Natural gas is crashing as oil spikes up.

The bond market has gone catatonic, with billions pouring into bond mutual funds to keep them on life support. Dr. Copper, that great leading indicator of global economic activity, has gone to sleep, with investors pouring money into the entire spectrum of risk assets. An increasing share of the buying in equity markets is focusing on a single stock, Apple (AAPL), the world?s largest company.

They say the market climbs a wall of worry. This one is climbing the Great Wall of China. You have to assume that the people buying stocks here are doing so only for the very long term, Warren Buffet style, and are willing to look past any declines we may see this summer. They don?t care if the market drops 5%, 20% (my pick), or 50%.

In my new year Annual Asset Class Review I thought that markets might peak in January. I lied. Thanks to a global quantitative easing program, it is increasingly looking like 2012 will be another ?sell in May and go away? year, the fourth in a row. You might as well book that Mediterranean super yacht, the beach house in the Hamptons, or the bucolic chalet in Switzerland now to beat the rush.

Another ?looking glass? element this year is the extent that last year?s dogs became this year?s divas. Just look no further than Bank of America (BAC), which did a 67% swan dive in 2011, but has soared a blistering 51% this year. This is a stock with a PE multiple of 812 and more investigations underway than Al Capone every saw.

It goes without saying then that those who did terrible in 2011 are looking like stars today. Look no further than hedge fund titan John Paulson, whose flagship fund was down 50% at the low last year, thanks to a big bet on financials. This year it appears his super star status is restored. Other funds that made big bets last year on European stocks and sovereign bonds have been similarly revived. If MF Global had only lasted two more months, John Corzine would be looking like a genius today, instead of a goat.

When I realized that this could be a ?dogs of the Dow? year with a turbocharger, I quickly reviewed by own money losing trades in 2011. That prompted be to rush out but puts on the Japanese yen, which doubled in short order, and haven?t looked back since. Now you really have to ask the question, will my other 2011 losers perform similar turnarounds? What?s at the top of the list? The (TBT), my bet that long term Treasury bonds would go down, which inflicted my biggest hickey last year.

By the way, I?m kind of liking the volatility ETF (VXX) here. If the markets keep going up forever you might lose 10%. If they don?t, you will make a quick 30%, and 100% if volatilities return to the highs seen in October. The cost of carry is modest, there is no time decay as with options, and there is no contango. In fact, near month volatility is trading at half the levels of long term volatility. That is the kind of risk/reward ratio that I am constantly looking for.

My Favorite Stock to Short

Diary

Troubled Bank of America (BAC) certainly earned its title as the premier Dog of the Dow last year. It managed an appalling 58% decline in 2011, the worst of any of the 30 Index stocks. It only managed to stay above the crucial $5 level by a hair?s breadth, below which many pension funds are barred from owning shares.

Since the beginning of this year, it has been the best performer, soaring 48% from $5.60 to $8.30. Will this eye-popping turnaround continue?

I think it is more likely that the enormous Lake Tahoe outside my window freezes into a gigantic mango smoothie.? Its credentials as a ?zombie? bank are as good as ever, and it will continue to play a leading role in the horror story our financial system has become.

(BAC) has become the poster boy for ?too big to manage?. The bank is still, by many measures, the largest in the US, with $2.3 trillion in assets, 288,000 employees, 5,900 branches, and 18,000 ATM?s. One out of two Americans are said to have an account at the North Carolina based institution. The $84 billion market cap company earned a penny a share last year, giving a price earnings multiple of a mind blowing 802.

The problem is that the company is so gargantuan that by the time information filters up to the top, it has become old, irrelevant, or even dangerous. It seems to want to plunge into every ?flavor of the day? strategy, which is always fatal for any organization that turns with the speed of a supertanker.

It plunged into proprietary trading in the early 2000?s, despite a woeful lack of talent to execute. Its 2007 purchase of Countrywide for $2 billion saddled it with a loan book so toxic that it still may not survive. It paid $50 billion for Merrill Lynch, when, if the positions were marked to market, it would have been worth only $1 or less.

Bank of America is a deer that can?t stay out of the headlights. Any online search about the company reveals a litany of problems, including mortgage fraud, robo signing, SEC sanctions and fines, municipal bond fraud, an ill-fated $5 debit card fee, and litigation up the wazoo. Oh, to be their outside counsel. Kaching!

The company recently announced disappointing earnings driven by falling revenues and rising costs. Their financial statement offered a panoply of special items, with prominent distressed assets sales used to cover losses. It is literally eating its seed corn to keep from starving to death. (BAC) attempted to pay a dividend in 2011, but that was nixed by the Federal Reserve due to its TARP obligations.

The size of the market that can meet their rising credit standards is shrinking dramatically, thanks to a 30 year long squeeze on the middle class. They might as well be a buggy whip manufacturer. The cost of regulation is skyrocketing. This is why I went on national TV last May and pounded the table to get viewers to sell it short at $13.50.

Despite the whopping great rally in the share price, they are trading at a big discount to book value, meaning that investors think the bank is still carrying large, unrealized loan losses on its books. Now Moody?s has threatened to downgrade the bank?s credit rating a couple of notches, which would increase its borrowing costs substantially. They are truly caught between a rock and a hard place.

I am not one of these glum guys who think that Bank of America will go bankrupt. That was a 2008 story. Don?t worry, your deposits are safe. It is far more likely to get broken up. First on the block will be Merrill Lynch, which is worth more today than in the dark days of four years ago. Think of it as (BAC)?s General Motors. Management is also making noises about withdrawing from Texas and other major markets.

There may be a time for a true national bank in the US, but that time is not now. Not when they play at being hedge funds on the side without the slightest idea of how to do so, and then blow up with your money inside, requiring taxpayer assistance. But there is a trade here for the nimble.

This is the really interesting part. Bank of America has become the favorite whipping boy of the high frequency traders. Because of them, its shares frequently accounted for 10% or more of NYSE volume last year. They have increased the volatility of these shares dramatically.? As a result, (BAC) is one of the highest beta large caps in the market.

What does this mean for the average punter working behind a PC (or Mac) at home? That a rapid 50% jump in shares is likely to be followed by a sudden 25% plunge. At this level, it has become the classic ?heads you win, tails I win 5X? situation if positioned appropriately.

The algorithms are lurking out there just waiting to pounce on this pitiful stock like a hungry leopard. Take a look at the chart below, and the setup is as clear as day. Despite an (SPX) that ground up to new highs nearly every day last week, (BAC) stock has begun rolling over like the Bismarck. Get a serious ?RISK OFF? day in global assets, and this thing could dive like a kamikaze.

No surprise then that (BAC) has become my favorite stock to sell short.

Tag Archive for: (BAC)

<img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-37238" src="https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Bank-of-America-ATM-e1411681030258.jpg" alt="Bank of America - ATM" width="400" height="228" />Time to Visit the ATM Again

<img decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-19339" src="https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/John-Thomas-and-Barney-Frank.jpg" alt="John Thomas and Barney Frank" width="400" height="249" />Barney Frank Had a Few Things to Say

Looking for More Market Insights

Hmmm. Doesn?t Look Like Ben Bernanke

Time to Visit the ATM Again

Barney Frank Had a Few Things to Say