• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: (QCOM)

MHFTR

Why the Big Deal Over ZTE?

Tech Letter

Here's the conundrum.

Beyond cutting-edge technology, there's nothing that China WANTS OR NEEDS to buy from the U.S. China's largest imports are in energy and foodstuffs, both globally traded commodities.

China is playing the long game because it can.

Earlier this year, China altered its constitution to remove term limits and any obstacle that would hinder Chairman Xi to serve indefinitely.

If it's two, four, eight or 10 years, no problem, China will wait it out.

As it stands, China is enjoying the status quo, which is a robust economic trajectory of 6.7% economic growth YOY and at that rate will leapfrog America as the biggest economy in the world by 2030.

China does not need handouts.

It already has its mooncake and is eating it.

The Chinese are also betting that Donald Trump fades away with the passage of time, possibly soon, and that a vastly different administration will enter the fray with an entirely different strategy.

The indefinite "hold" pattern is a polite way to say we surrender.

ZTE Corporation is a Chinese telecommunications equipment manufacturer and low-end smartphone maker based in Shenzhen, China.

This seemingly innocuous company is ground zero for the U.S. vs China trade practice dispute.

The U.S. Department of Commerce banned American tech companies from selling components to ZTE for seven years, crippling its supply chain after violating sanctions against Iran and North Korea.

ZTE uses about 30% of American components to produce its smorgasbord of telecom equipment and down-market cell phones.

What most people do not know is that ZTE is the fourth most prevalent smartphone in America, only behind Apple, Samsung, and LG, commanding a 12.2% market share, and its phones require an array of American made silicon parts.

In 2017, the company shipped more than 20 million phones to the United States.

The ruling effectively put ZTE out of business because the lack of components shelved production.

Low-end smartphones account for almost one-third of total revenue.

ZTE could very well have survived with a direct hit to its consumer phone business, but the decision to ban components made the telecom equipment division inoperable.

This segment accounts for a heavy 58.2% of revenue. Therefore, disrupting ZTE's supply chain would effectively take down more than 91% of its business for a company that employs 75,000 employees in over 160 countries.

Upon news of ZTE's imminent demise, the administration made a U-turn on its initial decision stating "too many jobs in China lost."

The reversal made America look bad.

It shows that America is being dictated to and not the other way around.

When did it become the responsibility of the American administration to fill Chinese jobs for a company that is a threat to national security?

The Chinese refused to continue talks with the visiting delegation until the ZTE situation was addressed.

Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin and company were able to "continue" the talks then were politely shown the door.

Bending the rules for ZTE should have never been a prerequisite for talks, stressing the lack of firepower in the administration's holster.

However, stranding the delegation in Chinese hotel rooms for days waiting in limbo, without offering an audience, would have caused even more humiliation and anguish for the administration.

China is not interested in buying much from America, but one thing it needs -- and needs in droves -- are chips.

Long term, this ZTE ban is great for China.

I believe China will use this episode to rile up the nationalistic rhetoric and make it a point to wean itself from American chips.

However, for the time being, American chips are the most valuable import America can offer China, and that won't change for the foreseeable future.

The numbers back me up.

Micron (MU) earns more than $10 billion in revenue from China, which makes up over 51% of its total revenue.

Qualcomm (QCOM), mainly through its lucrative licensing division, makes more than $14.5 billion from its Chinese revenue, which comprises over 65% of revenue.

Texas Instruments (TXN) earns more than 44% of revenue from China, and almost a quarter of Intel's (INTC) revenue is derived from its China operations.

The biggest name embedded in China is Apple (AAPL), which earned almost $45 billion in sales last year. Its China revenue is three times larger than any other American company.

In less than a decade, China has caught up.

China now has adequate local smartphone substitutes through Huawei, Oppo, Vivo, and Xiaomi phones.

Skyworks Solutions (SWKS), a chip company reliant on iPhone contracts, is most levered toward the Chinese market capturing almost 83% of revenue from China.

You would think these chips would be the first on the chopping block in a trade war. However, you are wrong.

China needs all the chips it can get because there is no alternative.

Stopping the inflow of chips is another way of stopping China from doing business and developing technology.

The Chinese economy has been led by the powerful BATs of Baidu (BIDU), Tencent, and Alibaba (BABA) occupying the same prominent role the American FANGs hold in the American economy.

They are not interested in digging their own grave.

To execute the 2025 plan to become the world leaders in advanced technology, they need chips that power all modern electronic devices.

The most likely scenario is that China maintains development using American chips for the time being and slowly pivots to the Korean chip sector, which is vulnerable to Chinese political pressure.

Remember that South Koreans have two of the three biggest chip companies in the world in Samsung and SK Hynix. China has used economic coercion to get what it wants from Korea in the past or to prove a point.

Korean multinational companies, shortly after the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) installation on the Korean peninsula, were penalized by the Chinese government shutting down mainland Korean stores, temporarily banning Chinese tourism in South Korea, and blocking K-pop stars from performing in the lucrative Chinese market.

The Chinese communist government can turn the screws when it wants and how it wants.

Therefore, the next battleground for tech could migrate to South Korean chip companies as China is on a mission to suck up as much high-grade tech ingenuity as possible while it can.

China has some easy targets to whack down if the administration forces it into a corner with a knife to its throat.

Non-tech companies are ripe for massacre because they do not produce chips.

Companies such as Procter & Gamble, Starbucks, McDonald's, and Nike could be replaced by a Chinese imitation in a jiffy.

Apple is the 800-pound gorilla in the room.

An attack on Apple would hyper-accelerate tension between two leaders to the highest it's ever been and would be the straw that breaks the camel's back.

Technology has transformed the world.

Technology also has been adopted by nations as a critical component to national security.

Nothing has changed fundamentally, and nothing will.

China will become the biggest economy in the world by 2030.

China will kick the proverbial can down the road because it can. It never has to cooperate with America again.

Contrary to expectations, American chip companies are untouchable, and investors won't see Micron suddenly losing half its revenue over this trade war.

Until China can produce higher quality chips, it will lap up as much of Uncle Sam's chips until it can force transfer the chip technology from the Koreans.

American chip companies can breathe a sigh of relief.

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"If we go to work at 8 a.m. and go home at 5 p.m., this is not a high-tech company and Alibaba will never be successful. If we have that kind of 8-to-5 spirit, then we should just go and do something else." - said Alibaba founder and executive chairman Jack Ma.

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-23 01:05:202018-05-23 01:05:20Why the Big Deal Over ZTE?
MHFTR

May 9, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 9, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(HERE'S THE TOP STOCK IN THE MARKET TO BUY TODAY),
(MSFT), (AMZN), (AAPL), (APTV), (QCOM), (FB)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-09 01:06:162018-05-09 01:06:16May 9, 2018
MHFTR

Here's the Top Stock in the Market to Buy Today

Tech Letter

When the CEO of Microsoft, Satya Nadella, sits down for a candid interview, I move mountains then cross heaven and hell to listen to him, and you should, too.

Microsoft is at the top of my list as a conviction buy.

Nadella is one of the great CEOs of our time and was able to complete Microsoft's makeover after Steve Ballmer's insipid tenure at the helm.

Microsoft's Build conference is the perfect platform for Nadella to share his wisdom about the company, industry, and changes going forward.

In an age where tech CEOs thrive off of smoke and mirrors, Nadella was succinct conveying the concept of trust as the secret sauce that will help tech's digital footprint expand into new territories.

Trust infused products through the cloud and A.I. will be the perfect archetype of future tech that will encourage accelerated adoption rates.

A.I. was the message of the day at the Build conference. Nadella used the term A.I. 14 times and the word cloud four times when interviewed.

It was fitting that Microsoft wowed the audience with a sparkly, new-fangled demo.

The demo put on by Microsoft in conjunction with Amazon's (AMZN) Alexa showed smart-assistants working in collaboration.

Microsoft showed how it is possible to use a PC Windows desktop to order an Uber car through Amazon's Alexa.

This technology is very powerful and is a work-around for the "walled garden" problem where big companies are closing off their systems only to proprietary software and products limiting upside potential.

The ability to collaborate with multiple A.I. smart systems will generate a whole new layer of business catering toward the communication and business developments among A.I. systems.

Nadella also offered extended examples of A.I. applications, for instance, the capability of detecting cracks in an oil pipeline and running recognition software through a drone using a Qualcomm (QCOM) manufactured camera to monitor the state of containers.

Trusting A.I. will expedite the usage of A.I. business applications, and the companies diverting capital into A.I. enhancement will reap from what they sow.

The knock-on effect is that university A.I. staff members are being poached faster than a breakfast egg. There is a bidding war going on as we speak from both sides of the Pacific.

Facebook is opening new A.I. research centers in Seattle and Pittsburgh.

Previously, A.I. was a buzzword and companies would trot out a visually stimulating display with pizzazz. But that is all changing with A.I. swiftly moving into the backbone of all business operations.

Ottomatika, a company that develops software for autonomous cars acquired by Aptiv (APTV), was entirely a Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) in-house project that was picked up by Aptiv for commercial applications.

In one fell swoop, (CMU) lost a whole team of leading A.I. researchers.

Microsoft is a premium stock because it straddles both sides of the fence.

On one side, it's an uber growth company with Microsoft Azure growing 93% YOY satisfying investors requirement for insatiable growth.

On the other hand, Microsoft is robustly lucrative profiting $21.20 billion in 2017, and would be a Warren Buffett-type of cash flow reliant stock even though he has smothered any inkling of buying Microsoft shares because of his close relationship with co-founder Bill Gates.

Even Microsoft's legacy product Microsoft Office 365 is a gangbuster segment swelling 42% YOY.

This contrasts with other legacy companies that are attempting to wean themselves from their own outdated products.

Office 365 products are still embedded in daily life, and I am using it now to type this story.

On the technical side of it, Microsoft is beefing up its developer tools.

Microsoft will integrate Kubernetes, an open-source system for automating deployment, into the Azure as well as upping its Azure Bot Service adding 100 new features.

There are more than 300,000 developers who operate the Azure Bot Service alone.

The slew of upgrades for developers will enhance the power of Microsoft's software and ecosystem.

The overarching theme to the Build conference is the integration of A.I. into real life business applications and the importance of the cloud.

Now the Cloud.

Nadella reaffirmed Microsoft's position in the cloud wars characterizing the current environment as a duo of Amazon and Microsoft with Google trailing behind.

Microsoft has the potential to nick Amazon's position as the industry's cloud leader because of the unique set of products it can combine with the cloud.

Most of the world utilizes a mix of PC-based hardware, using Microsoft's software and operating system, supplemented by an Android-based smartphone.

As expected, Microsoft, Alphabet (GOOGL), and Amazon are spending a pretty penny advancing their cloud business.

Microsoft spends more than $1 billion per month on Azure cloud data centers.

This number now surpasses the entire annual Microsoft R&D budget.

In the interview, Nadella cited that Microsoft now has 50 domestic data centers.

Amazon habitually holds between 50,000 to 80,000 servers at each data center. Extrapolate the lower range of the number with 50 data centers and Microsoft could have at least 2.5 million servers working for its data needs.

The barriers of entry have never been higher in the cloud industry because the costs are spiraling out of control.

Few people have billions upon billions to make this business work at the appropriate scale.

Tom Keane, head of Global Infrastructure at Microsoft Azure, recently said that Azure meets 58 compliance requirements set forth by the federal government, industry, and local players.

Azure is the first cloud that satisfies the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement criteria for contractors to handle Department of Defense work.

Regulation has emerged as one of the controversial issues of 2018, and this did not get lost in the shuffle.

The trust comment was clearly a thinly veiled swipe against Facebook's (FB) much frowned upon business model, making it commonplace these days for prominent CEOs to distance themselves from Mark Zuckerberg's creation.

Protecting a company's image and reputation is paramount in the new rigid era of big data.

Nadella's anti-Facebook rhetoric continued by noting the auction-based pricing standards are "funky," explaining the model is counterintuitive. His reason was that as demand increases, the price should drop and not rise.

Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook has largely been negative about Facebook's tactics. The fury is justified when you consider Apple and Microsoft hustle industriously to develop software and hardware products while Facebook manipulates user data to profit from collected data. A nice shortcut if there ever was one.

It's clear that Apple and Microsoft have no interest in giving third parties access to personal data because the leadership understands it is a slippery slope to go down and unsustainable.

Nadella's emphasis on tech ethics is a breath of fresh air and the data Microsoft accumulates is used to improve the cloud and software products rather than pedal to mercenaries.

The companies that have staying power create proprietary products that cannot be replicated.

Microsoft's assortment of software products acts as the perfect gateway into the cloud and is a moat widening tool.

A.I. and the cloud are all you need to know, and Microsoft is at the heart of this revolutionary movement.

Any weakness of Microsoft's shares into the low-90s is a screaming buy.

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"Innovation has nothing to do with how many R&D dollars you have. When Apple came up with the Mac, IBM was spending at least 100 times more on R&D. It's not about money. It's about the people you have, how you're led, and how much you get it." - said Apple cofounder Steve Jobs.

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-09 01:05:572018-05-09 01:05:57Here's the Top Stock in the Market to Buy Today
MHFTR

April 6, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 6, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(THE IMPLICATIONS OF INTEL'S LOST APPLE CONTRACT),

(INTC), (AAPL), (AVGO), (QCOM), (AMD), (NVDA)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-06 01:06:032018-04-06 01:06:03April 6, 2018
MHFTR

The Implications of Intel's Lost Apple Contract

Tech Letter

There is plenty of turmoil in chip land these days.

Investors should not freak out, or worse, dump their Intel (INTC) shares on pain of death.

Take a deep breath ... and I'll explain why Intel is still a great stock into which you should dip your toes.

Apple (AAPL) reportedly plans to replace Intel processors in Mac computers with its own proprietary chips starting around 2020. It is useless for investors to prognosticate the worst-case scenario playing out because this announcement will not put Intel out of business.

This is not the first phase of the death of Intel and represents a fabulous entry point into a beacon of tech stability.

Apple started placing Intel CPUs into its MacBook Pro and iMac in 2006 and have enjoyed a fruitful relationship since then.

As technology mutates at lightning speed, Apple justifiably desires more control over its chip design to create the innovative end product it envisions and provide a smoother experience between mobile and desktop devices.

Intel's engineers cannot match the pace of Apple's chip improvements that use ARM-based processors, which Apple has stuck into devices using the iOS system, including the Apple Watch and the Apple TV.

Apple's latest gadgets are more powerful than its past Macs, and its future is better served by tailor-making its chip architecture for its devices.

Security will be bolstered by procuring more control over design construction.

Intel still boasts the world's most popular CPU chip line for laptops and desktop computers, and hyper-increasing global demand for silicon chips will fail to disrupt Intel's growth trajectory.

Remember that the CPU chip line is Intel's legacy business, and this lump of the operation will slowly fade away into oblivion anyway.

Apple's top-end computers will still use Intel's chips such as the iMac Pro and Mac Pro revision until they can transition to in-house chips.

This trend has staying power with Apple designing its own iPhone chips partially due to removing its heavy reliance on Qualcomm (QCOM). It also has locked horns in court for years adding tension to the relationship.

On a relative basis, iMacs are just a fragment of the overall laptop market at 7.3% during the fourth quarter of 2017.

Apple's announcement could shed $1.8 billion in annual gross profit from Intel's earnings.

Intel accumulated $62.8 billion in sales in 2017, and losing Apple's business is only a small hiccup in the bigger scheme of things.

In late 2017, Intel poached the former head of AMD's (AMD) graphics business to head up a new high-end graphics division.

Raja Koduri, the new chief architect and senior vice president of the newly formed Core and Visual Computing division at Intel, will enable the company to directly compete with AMD and Nvidia (NVDA) in the GPU market.

The competition with AMD is a big deal because AMD has caught up with Intel and could steal CPU market share.

AMD has built its own comprehensive lineup of PC CPU chips while Intel unveiled its eighth generation Core processors on April 3.

Acquiring new segments with its cash hoard is another way to move forward.

Rumors were rife with reports suggesting Intel would acquire Broadcom (AVGO) to create the biggest chip maker in the world.

This was a defensive maneuver to combat the possible combination of a Broadcom-Qualcomm merger that would damage Intel's market share in chips for mobile phones and cars.

By getting into bed with Broadcom, Intel could scrap the construction of the world's third-largest chipmaker, after Intel itself and Korea's Samsung.

Altera and Mobileye are companies Intel added to its lineup using its egregiously large cash hoard.

Mobileye, an Israeli company, provides advanced driver assistance software that prevents collisions. This purchase clearly bolsters its autonomous vehicle technology division.

Altera, a San Jose, Calif.-based company, manufactures integrated circuits.

Intel is likely to remain the dominant force at the very high end of computing.

It would be foolish to only analyze Intel based on its legacy business as it has veered into a different growth mode and is not just a chip company anymore.

Intel has been weaning itself from the secular downtrend of computer chips and strategically established an unmovable position in the massive cloud data center and server business.

The Data Center Group, Intel's second largest segment and most vital, grew 20% YOY, with $5.6 billion in revenue. Investors must keep close tabs on how this area performs because it is the lynchpin to emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and 5G in terms of overall infrastructure.

Intel's data center performance represents the harbinger of success, and Intel is doubling down on this future growth driver.

Cloud capital expenditures will rise 30 percent in 2018 because chunks of money must be thrown at this segment to stay relevant from cutthroat competition.

Computing is at an inflection point in 2018. Priorities have rotated to the data-centric phase of development. And Intel's CEO Brian Krzanich, who just received a nice pay rise to $21.5 million per year, will fill us in at Intel's next earnings call on April 26.

To visit Intel's website please click here.

 

 

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"Quality is much better than quantity. One home run is much better than two doubles." - said former Apple CEO, Steve Jobs in 2006.

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-06 01:05:132018-04-06 01:05:13The Implications of Intel's Lost Apple Contract
MHFTR

March 28. 2018

Diary, Newsletter

Global Market Comments
March 28, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(FRIDAY, APRIL 6, INCLINE VILLAGE, NEVADA, STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(FROM THE FRONT LINES OF THE TRADE WAR),
(AAPL), (AVGO), (QCOM), (TLT),
(HOW THE MAD HEDGE MARKET TIMING ALGORITHM TRIPLED MY PERFORMANCE)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-03-28 01:09:272018-03-28 01:09:27March 28. 2018
MHFTR

From the Front Line of the Trade War

Diary, Newsletter, Research

Poke your hand into a hornet's nest and you can count on an extreme reaction, a quite painful one.

As California is the growth engine for the entire US economy, accounting for 20% of US GDP, it is no surprise that it has become the primary target of Chinese retaliation in the new trade war.

The Golden State exported $28.5 billion worth of products to China in 2017, primarily electronic goods, with a host of agricultural products a close second.

In the most devious way possible, the Middle Kingdom targeted Trump supporters in the most liberal state in the country with laser-like focus. California exports 46% of its pistachios to China, followed by 35% of its exported plums, 20% of exported oranges, and 12% of its almonds.

By comparison, California imported a gargantuan $160.5 billion worth of goods from China last year, mostly electronics, clothing, toys, and other low-end consumer goods.

Some $16 billion of this was recycled back into the state via investment in real estate and technology companies.

Anecdotal evidence shows that figure could be dwarfed by the purchase of California homes by Chinese individuals looking for a safe place to hide their savings. Local brokers report that up to one-third of recent purchases have been by Chinese nationals paying all cash.

The Chinese tried to spend more. Their money is thought to be behind Broadcom's (AVGO) $105 billion bid for QUALCOMM (QCOM), which was turned down for national security reasons.

The next big chapter in the trade war will be over the theft of intellectual property, and that one will be ALL about the Golden State.

Also at risk is virtually Apple's (AAPL) entire manufacturing base in China, where more than 1 million workers at Foxconn assemble iPhones, Macs, iPads, and iPods.

The Cupertino, CA, giant could get squeezed from both sides. The Chinese could interfere with its production facilities, or its phones could get slapped with an American import duty.

So far, the trade war has been more bluff than bite. The US duties announced come to only $3 billion on $50 billion worth of trade. China responded with incredible moderation, only restricting $3 billion worth of imports.

By comparison, in 2017 the US imported a total of $505.6 billion in goods from China and exported $130.4 billion. Against this imbalance, the US runs a largest surplus in services.

The next Chinese escalation will involve a 25% tariff on American pork and recycled aluminum. Who is the largest pork producer in the US? Iowa, with $4.2 billion worth, and the location of an early presidential election primary.

Beyond that, Beijing has darkly hinted that is will continue to boycott new US Treasury bond auctions, as it has done for the past six months, or unload some if its massive $1.6 trillion in bond holdings.

Given the price action in the bond market today, with the United States Treasury Bond Fund (TLT) at a two-month high, I would say that the market doesn't believe that for two seconds. The Chinese won't cut off its nose to spite its face.

In the end, I think not much will come of this trade war. That's what the stock market told us yesterday with a monster 700-point rally, the biggest in three years.

The administration is discovering to its great surprise that its base is overwhelmingly against a trade war. And as business slows down, it will become evident in the numbers as well.

The US was the big beneficiary from the global trading system. Why change the rules of a game we are winning?

Still, national pride dies hard.

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/California-chart-1-1-e1522182790519.jpg 217 580 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-03-28 01:07:062018-03-28 01:07:06From the Front Line of the Trade War
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Qualcomm Guidance Crushes Stock

Diary, Free Research, Newsletter

It seems that the harder I work, the luckier I get.

Last week I made a bet that companies with a high share of international business would be punished severely during earnings season.

Specifically, I picked QUALCOMM (QCOM), the San Diego based maker of processors for cell phones, tablets, and laptops, because it had the highest percentage of foreign earnings among the S&P 500.

Three days later, after years of dawdling, the European Central Bank announced a particularly aggressive form of quantitative easing that sent the Euro crashing. You might as well have sent a torpedo directly into QUALCOMM?s bottom line.

The company?s Q4 earnings report, announced after the Tuesday close, confirmed my worst fears. While the earnings held up surprisingly well, the second half guidance was downright apocalyptic.

The stock immediately gapped down to $65 in the aftermarket, off some 8%, in a heartbeat.

Foreign earnings are a great place to hide when the greenback is soggy. It is a terrible place to be when the buck is moving from strength to strength, as it has for the past eight months.

It turns out that there is much more that is wrong under the hood at QUALCOMM than the recent collapse of the Euro and the Yen.

Much of the meteoric growth of Apple?s (AAPL) iPhone 6 sales in recent months has been at the expense of Samsung and other competitors. I hate to say ?I told you so? but I have been predicting this all along.

While QUALCOMM sells to both companies, particularly its Snapdragon 800 quadcore processor, it gets a lesser share of the profits on its sales to Apple. QUALCOMM is therefore, effectively, an indirect short position in Apple.

Oops!

I think you can take QUALCOMM?s woeful stock performance today as a warning that there is more suffering to come on the foreign earnings front by other companies yet to report.

For more depth on this, please read yesterday?s piece on ?The Unintended Consequences of the Euro Crash? by clicking here.

As for the happy holders of my recommended QUALCOMM (QCOM) February, 2015 $75-$80 in-the-money bear put spread, good for you! You have just made a nearly instant 2.25% profit on your total portfolio in a mere seven trading days. That works out to a gain of 22% on this single position.

There is no point in running this position the remaining three weeks into the February 20 expiration, as you have already reaped 95% of the potential profit. Better to free up the cash to roll into a new position, while simultaneously reducing your risk.

Or, you could simply take a long vacation from the miserable, unforgiving market.

QCOM 1-28-15

ShipThere Goes QUALCOMM?s Earnings

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Ship-e1422539739992.jpg 262 400 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2015-01-29 09:10:192015-01-29 09:10:19Qualcomm Guidance Crushes Stock
Page 7 of 7«‹567

tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with Mad Hedge Fund Trader (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastytrade pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastytrade and/or any of its affiliated companies. Neither tastytrade nor any of its affiliated companies is responsible for the privacy practices of Marketing Agent or this website. tastytrade does not warrant the accuracy or content of the products or services offered by Marketing Agent or this website. Marketing Agent is independent and is not an affiliate of tastytrade. 

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • FAQ
Scroll to top